Product comparison · 2 monitors crt

LG W2042P-SF monitor CRT vs Philips 22" Real Flat QXGA CRT

Add a product
  • 8specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 0identical
  • 24known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips 22" Real Flat QXGA CRT has 224 mm more depth than the LG W2042P-SF monitor CRT (466 mm vs 242 mm). The Philips 22" Real Flat QXGA CRT has 91 mm more height than the LG W2042P-SF monitor CRT (501 mm vs 410 mm). The Philips 22" Real Flat QXGA CRT has 21.8 kg more weight than the LG W2042P-SF monitor CRT (26.3 kg vs 4.5 kg). Display diagonal: 50.8 cm (20") on the LG W2042P-SF monitor CRT, 55.9 cm (22") on the Philips 22" Real Flat QXGA CRT. Type: LCD on the LG W2042P-SF monitor CRT, CRT on the Philips 22" Real Flat QXGA CRT.

  • Display diagonal
    • W2042P-SF monitor CRT:50.8 cm (20")
    • 22" Real Flat QXGA CRT:55.9 cm (22")
  • Type
    • W2042P-SF monitor CRT:LCD
    • 22" Real Flat QXGA CRT:CRT
  • Display resolution
    • W2042P-SF monitor CRT:1680 x 1050 pixels
    • 22" Real Flat QXGA CRT:1024 x 768 pixels
  • Pixel pitch
    • W2042P-SF monitor CRT:0.258 x 0.258 mm
    • 22" Real Flat QXGA CRT:0.25
  • Depth
    • W2042P-SF monitor CRT:242 mm
    • 22" Real Flat QXGA CRT:466 mm
  • Height
    • W2042P-SF monitor CRT:410 mm
    • 22" Real Flat QXGA CRT:501 mm
  • Weight
    • W2042P-SF monitor CRT:4.5 kg
    • 22" Real Flat QXGA CRT:26.3 kg
  • Width
    • W2042P-SF monitor CRT:474 mm
    • 22" Real Flat QXGA CRT:501 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of W2042P-SF, 22" Real Flat QXGA CRT
32 specifications
Display4 differ
Display diagonalDiffers50.8 cm (20")55.9 cm (22")
TypeDiffersLCDCRT
Display resolutionDiffers1680 x 1050 pixels1024 x 768 pixels
Viewable size, verticalKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source29.4 cm
Viewable size, horizontalKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source39.2 cm
Viewable size diagonalKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5.5 cm
Vertical scan rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50 - 160 Hz
Horizontal scan rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 - 130 kHz
Maximum resolutionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2048 x 1536 pixels
Pixel pitchDiffers0.258 x 0.258 mm0.25
Recommended resolutionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1600 x 1200
BrightnessKnown for one300 cd/m2Unknown — not stated by the source
Display sRGBKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Response timeKnown for one5 msUnknown — not stated by the source
Viewing angleKnown for one170°Unknown — not stated by the source
Surface treatmentKnown for oneAG(3H)Unknown — not stated by the source
Featuresidentical
Swivel angle rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source90 - 90°
Plug and PlayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Tilt angle rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-5 - 25°
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCE Mark, E2000, FCC-B, UL, CSA, FDA, NUTEK, Energy Star, SEMKO, TCO '03, TÜV/GS, TÜV Ergo
Product colourKnown for oneSilverUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source215 W
Power consumption (off)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 W
Operational conditionsidentical
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-25 - 65 °C
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 - 35 °C
Weight & dimensions4 differ
DepthDiffers242 mm466 mm
HeightDiffers410 mm501 mm
WeightDiffers4.5 kg26.3 kg
WidthDiffers474 mm501 mm
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one474 x 242 x 410 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
System requirementsidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWindows 98/ME/2000/XP
Mac compatibilityKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitors crt comparisons

All monitors crt comparisons