Product comparison · 2 monitors crt

Lenovo ThinkVision C190 vs Samsung SyncMaster 997MB

Add a product
  • 12specifications compared
  • 7differ
  • 5identical
  • 18known for one product only

Key differences

The Lenovo ThinkVision C190 has 0.05 more pixel pitch than the Samsung SyncMaster 997MB (0.25 vs 0.20). The Lenovo ThinkVision C190 has 3 kg more weight than the Samsung SyncMaster 997MB (21.2 kg vs 18.2 kg). Type: Flat CRT on the Lenovo ThinkVision C190, Dyna Flat on the Samsung SyncMaster 997MB. Display resolution: 1280 x 1024 pixels on the Lenovo ThinkVision C190, 1920 x 1440 pixels on the Samsung SyncMaster 997MB. Power management: VESA DPMS on the Lenovo ThinkVision C190, EPA/VESA DPMS on the Samsung SyncMaster 997MB.

  • Type
    • ThinkVision C190:Flat CRT
    • SyncMaster 997MB:Dyna Flat
  • Display resolution
    • ThinkVision C190:1280 x 1024 pixels
    • SyncMaster 997MB:1920 x 1440 pixels
  • Pixel pitch
    • ThinkVision C190:0.25
    • SyncMaster 997MB:0.20
  • Power management
    • ThinkVision C190:VESA DPMS
    • SyncMaster 997MB:EPA/VESA DPMS
  • Dimensions (W x D x H) with stand
    • ThinkVision C190:456 x 458 x 468 mm
    • SyncMaster 997MB:445 x 457.5 x 416 mm
  • Weight
    • ThinkVision C190:21.2 kg
    • SyncMaster 997MB:18.2 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of ThinkVision C190, SyncMaster 997MB
30 specifications
Display3 differ
Display diagonal48.3 cm (19")48.3 cm (19")
TypeDiffersFlat CRTDyna Flat
Display resolutionDiffers1280 x 1024 pixels1920 x 1440 pixels
Vertical scan range50 - 160 Hz50 - 160 Hz
Horizontal scan range30 - 96 kHz30 - 96 kHz
Monitor sync input signalKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceSeparate H/V, Composite
Maximum resolutionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1920 x 1440 pixels
Pixel pitchDiffers0.250.20
Surface treatmentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMulti-Layer Coating
Recommended resolutionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1280x1024 @85Hz; 1600x1200 @75Hz
Viewable size, verticalKnown for one27.4 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size, horizontalKnown for one36.6 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size diagonalKnown for one45.7 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Featuresidentical
Plug and PlayYesYes
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceTCO'03
Swivel angle rangeKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Tilt angle rangeKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
I/O portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source15-pin D-Sub, 5 BNC
Power1 differ
Power managementDiffersVESA DPMSEPA/VESA DPMS
Power consumption (typical)100 W100 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 W
Power requirementsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAC 90-264VAC, 50/60Hz
Weight & dimensions2 differ
Dimensions (W x D x H) with standDiffers456 x 458 x 468 mm445 x 457.5 x 416 mm
WeightDiffers21.2 kg18.2 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source557 x 607 x 507 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source21.5 kg
System requirements1 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffersWindows ME, Windows 2000, Windows XPWindows 2000/ME/XP
Technical detailsidentical
Special featuresKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMagicBright Highlight Zone III
Video Dot RateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source250 MHz
Management featuresidentical
User controlsKnown for oneDegauss via Power Switch, Degauss via Control Panel, Brightness, Contrast, Vertical position, Vertical size, Zoom, Horizontal size, Image rotation, Keystone, Keystone Balance, Language Select, Moire control, OSD position, Selectable color points (9300K/6500K/5500K), Horizontal position, Geometry resUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitors crt comparisons

All monitors crt comparisons