Product comparison · 2 monitors crt

Dell E772P monitor CRT vs Samsung SyncMaster 997MB

Add a product
  • 6specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 0identical
  • 25known for one product only

Key differences

The Samsung SyncMaster 997MB has 3 kg more weight than the Dell E772P monitor CRT (18.2 kg vs 15.2 kg). The Samsung SyncMaster 997MB has 3.5 kg more package weight than the Dell E772P monitor CRT (21.5 kg vs 18 kg). Display diagonal: 43.2 cm (17") on the Dell E772P monitor CRT, 48.3 cm (19") on the Samsung SyncMaster 997MB. Type: CRT on the Dell E772P monitor CRT, Dyna Flat on the Samsung SyncMaster 997MB. Maximum resolution: 1280 x 1024 pixels on the Dell E772P monitor CRT, 1920 x 1440 pixels on the Samsung SyncMaster 997MB.

  • Display diagonal
    • E772P monitor CRT:43.2 cm (17")
    • SyncMaster 997MB:48.3 cm (19")
  • Type
    • E772P monitor CRT:CRT
    • SyncMaster 997MB:Dyna Flat
  • Maximum resolution
    • E772P monitor CRT:1280 x 1024 pixels
    • SyncMaster 997MB:1920 x 1440 pixels
  • Pixel pitch
    • E772P monitor CRT:0.270 x 0.270 mm
    • SyncMaster 997MB:0.20
  • Weight
    • E772P monitor CRT:15.2 kg
    • SyncMaster 997MB:18.2 kg
  • Package weight
    • E772P monitor CRT:18 kg
    • SyncMaster 997MB:21.5 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of E772P, SyncMaster 997MB
31 specifications
Display4 differ
Display diagonalDiffers43.2 cm (17")48.3 cm (19")
TypeDiffersCRTDyna Flat
Display resolutionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1920 x 1440 pixels
Vertical scan rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50 - 160 Hz
Horizontal scan rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 - 96 kHz
Monitor sync input signalKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceSeparate H/V, Composite
Maximum resolutionDiffers1280 x 1024 pixels1920 x 1440 pixels
Pixel pitchDiffers0.270 x 0.270 mm0.20
Surface treatmentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMulti-Layer Coating
Recommended resolutionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1280x1024 @85Hz; 1600x1200 @75Hz
Featuresidentical
Plug and PlayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceTCO'03
Product colourKnown for oneBlackUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
I/O portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source15-pin D-Sub, 5 BNC
Poweridentical
Power managementKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceEPA/VESA DPMS
Power consumption (typical)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 W
Power requirementsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAC 90-264VAC, 50/60Hz
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Dimensions (W x D x H) with standKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source445 x 457.5 x 416 mm
WeightDiffers15.2 kg18.2 kg
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one399 x 410.4 x 409 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging data1 differ
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source557 x 607 x 507 mm
Package weightDiffers18 kg21.5 kg
System requirementsidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWindows 2000/ME/XP
Technical detailsidentical
Special featuresKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMagicBright Highlight Zone III
Video Dot RateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source250 MHz
Operational conditionsidentical
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one5 - 95%Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one20 - 80%Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-20 - 60 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating altitudeKnown for one0 - 3000 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one0 - 40 °CUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitors crt comparisons

All monitors crt comparisons