Product comparison · 2 monitors crt

AOC 9K+ 19" CRT vs Samsung SyncMaster 997MB

Add a product
  • 12specifications compared
  • 9differ
  • 3identical
  • 19known for one product only

Key differences

The AOC 9K+ 19" CRT has 30 W more power consumption (typical) than the Samsung SyncMaster 997MB (130 W vs 100 W). The AOC 9K+ 19" CRT has 1.8 kg more weight than the Samsung SyncMaster 997MB (20 kg vs 18.2 kg). Type: CRT on the AOC 9K+ 19" CRT, Dyna Flat on the Samsung SyncMaster 997MB. Display resolution: 1600 x 1200 pixels on the AOC 9K+ 19" CRT, 1920 x 1440 pixels on the Samsung SyncMaster 997MB. Horizontal scan range: 30 - 98 kHz on the AOC 9K+ 19" CRT, 30 - 96 kHz on the Samsung SyncMaster 997MB.

  • Type
    • 9K+ 19" CRT:CRT
    • SyncMaster 997MB:Dyna Flat
  • Display resolution
    • 9K+ 19" CRT:1600 x 1200 pixels
    • SyncMaster 997MB:1920 x 1440 pixels
  • Horizontal scan range
    • 9K+ 19" CRT:30 - 98 kHz
    • SyncMaster 997MB:30 - 96 kHz
  • Pixel pitch
    • 9K+ 19" CRT:0.21 x 0.25 mm
    • SyncMaster 997MB:0.20
  • I/O ports
    • 9K+ 19" CRT:D-sub; CEE22
    • SyncMaster 997MB:15-pin D-Sub, 5 BNC
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • 9K+ 19" CRT:130 W
    • SyncMaster 997MB:100 W
  • Power requirements
    • 9K+ 19" CRT:100 - 240 V AC; 50/60 Hz
    • SyncMaster 997MB:AC 90-264VAC, 50/60Hz
  • Weight
    • 9K+ 19" CRT:20 kg
    • SyncMaster 997MB:18.2 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of 9K+ 19" CRT, SyncMaster 997MB
31 specifications
Display4 differ
Display diagonal48.3 cm (19")48.3 cm (19")
TypeDiffersCRTDyna Flat
Display resolutionDiffers1600 x 1200 pixels1920 x 1440 pixels
Vertical scan range50 - 160 Hz50 - 160 Hz
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers30 - 98 kHz30 - 96 kHz
Monitor sync input signalKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceSeparate H/V, Composite
Maximum resolutionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1920 x 1440 pixels
Pixel pitchDiffers0.21 x 0.25 mm0.20
Surface treatmentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMulti-Layer Coating
Recommended resolutionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1280x1024 @85Hz; 1600x1200 @75Hz
Viewable size diagonalKnown for one45.7 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Display viewable area (HxV)Known for one346 x 260 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Features1 differ
Plug and PlayYesYes
CertificationDiffersUL, FCC, FDA, CSA, TUV / GS, CETCO'03
Ports & interfaces1 differ
I/O portsDiffersD-sub; CEE2215-pin D-Sub, 5 BNC
Power2 differ
Power managementKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceEPA/VESA DPMS
Power consumption (typical)Differs130 W100 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 W
Power requirementsDiffers100 - 240 V AC; 50/60 HzAC 90-264VAC, 50/60Hz
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Dimensions (W x D x H) with standKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source445 x 457.5 x 416 mm
WeightDiffers20 kg18.2 kg
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one446 x 455 x 436 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source557 x 607 x 507 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source21.5 kg
System requirementsidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWindows 2000/ME/XP
Compatible productsKnown for oneVESA, UXGA, SXGA, XGA, SVGA, VGA, MacUnknown — not stated by the source
Compliance industry standardsKnown for oneTCO03Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Special featuresKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMagicBright Highlight Zone III
Video Dot RateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source250 MHz
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one10 - 85%Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one0 - 40 °CUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitors crt comparisons

All monitors crt comparisons