Product comparison · 2 monitors crt

AOC 17" FT720 Pure FlatFace vs Samsung SyncMaster 797MB

Add a product
  • 13specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 3identical
  • 18known for one product only

Key differences

The AOC 17" FT720 Pure FlatFace has 40 W more power consumption (typical) than the Samsung SyncMaster 797MB (120 W vs 80 W). The AOC 17" FT720 Pure FlatFace has 1.7 kg more weight than the Samsung SyncMaster 797MB (16 kg vs 14.3 kg). The Samsung SyncMaster 797MB has 140 MHz more video Dot Rate than the AOC 17" FT720 Pure FlatFace (250 MHz vs 110 MHz). Type: CRT on the AOC 17" FT720 Pure FlatFace, DynaFlat on the Samsung SyncMaster 797MB. Horizontal scan range: 30 - 72 kHz on the AOC 17" FT720 Pure FlatFace, 30 - 96 kHz on the Samsung SyncMaster 797MB.

  • Type
    • 17" FT720 Pure FlatFace:CRT
    • SyncMaster 797MB:DynaFlat
  • Horizontal scan range
    • 17" FT720 Pure FlatFace:30 - 72 kHz
    • SyncMaster 797MB:30 - 96 kHz
  • Maximum resolution
    • 17" FT720 Pure FlatFace:1280 x 1024 pixels
    • SyncMaster 797MB:1920 x 1440 pixels
  • Pixel pitch
    • 17" FT720 Pure FlatFace:0.21 x 0.25 mm
    • SyncMaster 797MB:0.2
  • Certification
    • 17" FT720 Pure FlatFace:UL, FCC, FDA, CSA, TUV / GS
    • SyncMaster 797MB:TCO'03, TÜV GS, CE
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • 17" FT720 Pure FlatFace:120 W
    • SyncMaster 797MB:80 W
  • Power requirements
    • 17" FT720 Pure FlatFace:100 - 240 V AC; 50/60 Hz
    • SyncMaster 797MB:AC 90-264VAC, 50/60Hz
  • Weight
    • 17" FT720 Pure FlatFace:16 kg
    • SyncMaster 797MB:14.3 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 17" FT720 Pure FlatFace, SyncMaster 797MB
31 specifications
Display4 differ
TypeDiffersCRTDynaFlat
Display resolutionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1920 x 1440 pixels
Vertical scan rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50 - 160 Hz
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers30 - 72 kHz30 - 96 kHz
Monitor sync input signalKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceSeparate H/V, Composite
Maximum resolutionDiffers1280 x 1024 pixels1920 x 1440 pixels
Pixel pitchDiffers0.21 x 0.25 mm0.2
Surface treatmentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMulti-Layer Coating
Recommended resolutionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1280x1024@85Hz
Display viewable area (HxV)Known for one300 x 230 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Display resolution at frequencyKnown for one640x350@70Hz, 720x400@70Hz, 640x480@60/72/75/85Hz, 800x600@60/72/75/85Hz, 1024x768@60/70/75/85Hz, 1280x1024@60/75/85HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Features1 differ
CertificationDiffersUL, FCC, FDA, CSA, TUV / GSTCO'03, TÜV GS, CE
Product colourKnown for oneGreyUnknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
Power managementKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceEPA/VESA DPMS
Power consumption (typical)Differs120 W80 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 W
Power requirementsDiffers100 - 240 V AC; 50/60 HzAC 90-264VAC, 50/60Hz
Management featuresidentical
User controlsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceOSD
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Dimensions (W x D x H) with standKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source401 x 378 x 410 mm
WeightDiffers16 kg14.3 kg
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one410 x 420 x 402 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source464 x 459 x 518 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source16.2 kg
Certificates1 differ
Electromagnetic emissionsDiffersMPRIIMPR-II
System requirementsidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWindows 2000/ME/XP
Compatible productsKnown for oneVESA, XGA, SVGA, VGAUnknown — not stated by the source
Technical details1 differ
Special featuresKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMagicBright 2 HighlightZone III
Video Dot RateDiffers110 MHz250 MHz

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitors crt comparisons

All monitors crt comparisons