All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 mobile device chargers

InLine 31506E mobile device charger Universal White AC Fast charging Indoor vs InLine USB PD power supply, GaN charger, 5-port, USB-C + USB-A

Add a product
  • 38specifications compared
  • 24differ
  • 14identical
  • 18known for one product only

Key differences

  • USB Type-C ports quantity
    • 2
    • 3
  • Number of simultaneously connected devices (max)
    • 3
    • 5
  • Product colour
    • White
    • Black
  • Input current
    • 1.5 A
    • 2.5 A
  • Maximum power
    • 65 W
    • 140 W
  • Minimum output voltage
    • 3.3 V
    • 5 V
  • Port 1 output power
    • 30 W
    • 100 W
  • Port 2 output power
    • 65 W
    • 100 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
56 specifications
A

InLine

31506E mobile device charger Universal White AC Fast charging Indoor

Model 31506E

View product
B

InLine

USB PD power supply, GaN charger, 5-port, USB-C + USB-A

Model 31553

View product
Performance3 differ
Charger typeIndoorIndoor
Charger compatibilityUniversalUniversal
Power source typeACAC
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityKnown for one2
USB Type-C ports quantityDiffers23
Wireless chargingNoNo
Fast chargingYesYes
Fast charging technologyDiffersGaN, Power Delivery 3.0, Quick Charge 4Quick Charge 3.0
Number of simultaneously connected devices (max)Differs35
USB Power Delivery (USB PD)YesYes
USB Power Delivery revision3.03.0
Power protection featuresKnown for oneOver voltage, Short circuit
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one1
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffersWhiteBlack
Gallium nitride (GaN) transistorsYesYes
Power10 differ
Input currentDiffers1.5 A2.5 A
Maximum powerDiffers65 W140 W
Maximum output voltage20 V20 V
Minimum output voltageDiffers3.3 V5 V
AC adapter powerKnown for one100 W
Port 1 output powerDiffers30 W100 W
Port 2 output powerDiffers65 W100 W
Port 3 output powerDiffers65 W100 W
Port 4 output powerKnown for one100 W
Port 5 output powerKnown for one100 W
Output current (5V)3 A3 A
Output current (9V)3 A3 A
Output current (12V)3 A3 A
Output current (15V)3 A3 A
Output current (20V)Differs3.25 A5 A
Port 1 output currentKnown for one5 A
Port 2 output currentKnown for one5 A
Port 3 output currentKnown for one5 A
Port 4 output currentKnown for one5 A
Port 5 output currentKnown for one5 A
Power consumption (no load)Differs0.27 W0.22 W
Average active efficiencyDiffers86.67 %86,22 % (230 V, 50 Hz, USB-C1 + USB-C2 + USB-C3 + USB-A1 + USB-A2 5.0 V / 2.0 A + 5.0 V / 2.0 A + 5.0 V / 2.0 A + 5.0 V / 2.4 A + 5.0 V / 2.4 A) / 90,04 % (230 V, 50 Hz, USB-C1 + USB-C2 + USB-C3 + USB-A1 + USB-A2 20,0 V / 3.25 A + 20.0 V / 1.5 A + 15.0 V / 1.33 A + 5.0 V / 2.4 A + 5.0 V / 2.4 A)
Efficiency at low load (10%)YesYes
Efficiency (@10 %)Differs76.64%85.54%
Input voltageKnown for one100 - 240 V
Input frequencyKnown for one50 - 60 Hz
AC adapter output currentKnown for one5 A
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers47 mm31 mm
DepthDiffers100 mm79 mm
HeightDiffers29 mm86 mm
WeightDiffers109 g289 g
Packaging data5 differ
Package widthDiffers86 mm146 mm
Package depthDiffers150 mm200 mm
Package heightDiffers32 mm49 mm
Package volumeDiffers400 cm³1400 cm³
Package weightDiffers142 g476 g
Package typeKnown for oneHanging box
Certificatesidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneCE
Logistics dataidentical
Country of originKnown for oneChina
Other features1 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs47 x 100 x 29 mm31 x 79 x 86 mm
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one1 pc(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile device charger comparisons

All mobile device charger comparisons