Product comparison · 2 mobile device chargers

Hama 173676 Universal Black AC Indoor vs Hama Qualcomm Quick Charge 2.0

Add a product
  • 6specifications compared
  • 1differ
  • 5identical
  • 8known for one product only

Key differences

  • USB 2.0 ports quantity
    • 173676 Universal Black AC Indoor:4
    • Qualcomm Quick Charge 2.0:1

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 173676, Qualcomm Quick Charge 2.0
14 specifications
Performance1 differ
USB 2.0 ports quantityDiffers41
Operating principleKnown for oneContactUnknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Cable lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.4 m
Poweridentical
Maximum powerKnown for one24 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power plug typeKnown for oneType F (CEE 7/4)Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum output voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 V
Other featuresidentical
Solar panel currentKnown for one4800 mAUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per packKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
Cables includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMicro-USB

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile device charger comparisons

All mobile device charger comparisons