Product comparison · 2 mobile device chargers

Hama 173676 Universal Black AC Indoor vs Hama Qualcomm Quick Charge 2.0

Add a product
  • 6specifications compared
  • 1differ
  • 5identical
  • 8known for one product only

Key differences

  • USB 2.0 ports quantity
    • 173676 Universal Black AC Indoor:4
    • Qualcomm Quick Charge 2.0:1

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of 173676, Qualcomm Quick Charge 2.0
14 specifications
Performance1 differ
Charger typeIndoorIndoor
Charger compatibilityUniversalUniversal
Power source typeACAC
USB 2.0 ports quantityDiffers41
Operating principleKnown for oneContactUnknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Product colourBlackBlack
Cable lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.4 m
Poweridentical
Input voltage100 - 240 V100 - 240 V
Maximum powerKnown for one24 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power plug typeKnown for oneType F (CEE 7/4)Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum output voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 V
Other featuresidentical
Solar panel currentKnown for one4800 mAUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per packKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
Cables includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMicro-USB

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile device charger comparisons

All mobile device charger comparisons