All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 lenses

Canon RF 28-70 mm f2.8 IS STM vs Canon RF135mm F1.8 L IS USM

Add a product
  • 31specifications compared
  • 17differ
  • 14identical
  • 27known for one product only

Key differences

The Canon RF135mm F1.8 L IS USM has 2 /12 more lens structure (elements/groups) than the Canon RF 28-70 mm f2.8 IS STM (17/12 vs 15/12). The Canon RF135mm F1.8 L IS USM has 0.43 m more closest focusing distance than the Canon RF 28-70 mm f2.8 IS STM (0.7 m vs 0.27 m). The Canon RF135mm F1.8 L IS USM has 0.5 more image stabilizer stops (IBIS x OIS) than the Canon RF 28-70 mm f2.8 IS STM (8 vs 7.5). Lens type: Standard zoom lens on the Canon RF 28-70 mm f2.8 IS STM, Telephoto zoom lens on the Canon RF135mm F1.8 L IS USM. Lens viewing angle, horizontal: 65° - 29° on the Canon RF 28-70 mm f2.8 IS STM, 15° on the Canon RF135mm F1.8 L IS USM.

  • Lens structure (elements/groups)
    • 15/12
    • 17/12
  • Lens type
    • Standard zoom lens
    • Telephoto zoom lens
  • Lens viewing angle, horizontal
    • 65° - 29°
    • 15°
  • Lens viewing angle, vertical
    • 46° - 19° 30'
    • 10°
  • Lens viewing angle, diagonal
    • 75° - 34°
    • 18°
  • Focal length range
    • 28 - 70 mm
    • 35 - 135 mm
  • Closest focusing distance
    • 0.27 m
    • 0.7 m
  • Image stabilizer number of stops (IBIS x OIS)
    • 7.5
    • 8

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
58 specifications
A

Canon

RF 28-70 mm f2.8 IS STMView product
B

Canon

RF135mm F1.8 L IS USMView product
Lens system9 differ
Lens structure (elements/groups)Differs15/1217/12
Lens typeDiffersStandard zoom lensTelephoto zoom lens
Lens viewing angle, horizontalDiffers65° - 29°15°
Focus adjustmentKnown for oneAuto/Manual
Lens viewing angle, verticalDiffers46° - 19° 30'10°
Fixed focal lengthKnown for one135 mm
Lens viewing angle, diagonalDiffers75° - 34°18°
Focal length rangeDiffers28 - 70 mm35 - 135 mm
Closest focusing distanceDiffers0.27 m0.7 m
Image sensor formatKnown for oneFull frame
Macro ratioKnown for one1:4
Maximum aperture numberKnown for one1.8
Number of aspheric elementsKnown for one0
Teleconverter/Extender compatibleKnown for oneNo
Image stabilizer typeDiffersIn-Body Image Stabilization (IBIS), Optical Image Stabilization (OIS)Optical Image Stabilization (OIS)
Image stabilizer number of stopsKnown for one6.5
Image stabilizer number of stops (IBIS x OIS)Differs7.58
Performance3 differ
AF actuatorDiffersSTMUSM
Auto focusKnown for oneYes
Circular apertureKnown for oneYes
Lens coating featuresDiffersSuper Spectra Coating (SSC)Air Sphere Coating (ASC), Super Spectra Coating (SSC)
Lens colourKnown for oneBlack
Manual focusKnown for oneYes
Number of Ultra-low Dispersion (UD) elementsKnown for one3
Lens hood modelDiffersEW-73DET-88B
Designidentical
Mounting typeKnown for oneBayonet
WeatherproofKnown for oneYes
Moisture-resistantKnown for oneYes
Logistics dataidentical
Country of originKnown for oneJapan
Quantity per packKnown for one1 pc(s)
Layers per palletKnown for one3 pc(s)
Master (outer) cases per pallet layerKnown for one6 pc(s)
Weight & dimensions4 differ
DiameterDiffers7.65 cm8.92 cm
Filter sizeDiffers67 mm82 mm
LengthDiffers92.2 mm133 mm
WeightDiffers490 g940 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package depthKnown for one300 mm
Package heightKnown for one250 mm
Package volumeKnown for one4842 cm³
Package weightKnown for one1.1 kg
Package widthKnown for one250 mm
Packaging content1 differ
Lens cap modelDiffersE-67 IIE-82 II
Rear lens cap includedKnown for oneYes
Rear lens cap modelKnown for oneRF

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More lens comparisons

All lens comparisons