Product comparison · 2 kvm extenders

ATEN KX9970FT KVM extender Transmitter vs ATEN 5K DisplayPort KVM over IP Receiver New

Add a product
  • 19specifications compared
  • 4differ
  • 15identical
  • 21known for one product only

Key differences

The ATEN KX9970FT KVM extender Transmitter has 84 Hz more maximum refresh rate than the ATEN 5K DisplayPort KVM over IP Receiver New (144 Hz vs 60 Hz). The ATEN 5K DisplayPort KVM over IP Receiver New has 1 more USB 2.0 ports quantity than the ATEN KX9970FT KVM extender Transmitter (4 vs 3). Type: Transmitter on the ATEN KX9970FT KVM extender Transmitter, Receiver on the ATEN 5K DisplayPort KVM over IP Receiver New. USB port type: USB Type-A/USB Type-B on the ATEN KX9970FT KVM extender Transmitter, USB Type-A on the ATEN 5K DisplayPort KVM over IP Receiver New.

  • Type
    • KX9970FT KVM extender Transmitter:Transmitter
    • 5K DisplayPort KVM over IP Receiver New:Receiver
  • Maximum refresh rate
    • KX9970FT KVM extender Transmitter:144 Hz
    • 5K DisplayPort KVM over IP Receiver New:60 Hz
  • USB port type
    • KX9970FT KVM extender Transmitter:USB Type-A/USB Type-B
    • 5K DisplayPort KVM over IP Receiver New:USB Type-A
  • USB 2.0 ports quantity
    • KX9970FT KVM extender Transmitter:3
    • 5K DisplayPort KVM over IP Receiver New:4

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of KX9970FT, KX9970R-AX-G
40 specifications
Features2 differ
TypeDiffersTransmitterReceiver
Connectivity technologyWiredWired
Maximum digital resolution5120 x 2880 pixels5120 x 2880 pixels
Maximum refresh rateDiffers144 Hz60 Hz
KVM port selectionKnown for oneOSD, Push-buttonsUnknown — not stated by the source
Supported resolutionsKnown for one5120 x 2880 @ 30 Hz, 5120 x 1440 @ 60 Hz, 4096 x 2160 @ 60 Hz (4:4:4), 2560 x 1440 @ 144 Hz, 1920 x 1080 @ 240 Hz (CVT-RB)Unknown — not stated by the source
On Screen Display (OSD)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Product colourBlackBlack
MaterialMetalMetal
LED indicatorsYesYes
Transmitteridentical
Transmitter video port typeKnown for oneDisplayPortUnknown — not stated by the source
Transmitter local keyboard/mouse port typeKnown for onePS/2Unknown — not stated by the source
Transmitter USB Type-B ports quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces2 differ
USB port typeDiffersUSB Type-A/USB Type-BUSB Type-A
USB 2.0 ports quantityDiffers34
USB data transfer rates480 Mbit/s480 Mbit/s
Installed SFP+ modules quantity22
PC Audio inYesYes
PC Audio outYesYes
RS-232 portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Poweridentical
Power consumption (transmitter) (max)Known for one17.99 WUnknown — not stated by the source
DC voltageKnown for one12 VUnknown — not stated by the source
DC-in jackKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Transmitter widthKnown for one16.3 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Transmitter depthKnown for one21.5 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Transmitter heightKnown for one4.2 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Transmitter weightKnown for one1.1 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Receiver widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source22.4 cm
Receiver depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source22.6 cm
Receiver heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5.3 cm
Receiver weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.38 kg
Packaging contentidentical
AC adapter includedYesYes
ManualYesYes
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)0 - 50 °C0 - 50 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)-20 - 60 °C-20 - 60 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)0 - 95%0 - 95%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)0 - 95%0 - 95%
Receiveridentical
RJ-45 ports quantity (receiver)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Receiver local keyboard/mouse port typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceUSB
Receiver local video port typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceDisplayPort

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More kvm extender comparisons

All kvm extender comparisons