Product comparison · 2 kvm extenders

ATEN CE924-AT-E KVM extender Transmitter & receiver vs Vertiv Avocent HMX8000 Digital KVM Extender Receiver – Wired

14specifications compared
7differ
7identical
36known for one product only

Key differences

The Vertiv Avocent HMX8000 Digital KVM Extender Receiver – Wired has 6.1 cm more transmitter width than the ATEN CE924-AT-E KVM extender Transmitter & receiver (21.5 cm vs 15.4 cm). The ATEN CE924-AT-E KVM extender Transmitter & receiver has 13.34 cm more transmitter depth than the Vertiv Avocent HMX8000 Digital KVM Extender Receiver – Wired (17.4 cm vs 4.06 cm). The Vertiv Avocent HMX8000 Digital KVM Extender Receiver – Wired has 18.12 cm more transmitter height than the ATEN CE924-AT-E KVM extender Transmitter & receiver (21 cm vs 2.88 cm). Type: Transmitter & receiver on the ATEN CE924-AT-E KVM extender Transmitter & receiver, Receiver on the Vertiv Avocent HMX8000 Digital KVM Extender Receiver – Wired. Transmitter weight: 820 g on the ATEN CE924-AT-E KVM extender Transmitter & receiver, 1.81 kg on the Vertiv Avocent HMX8000 Digital KVM Extender Receiver – Wired.

Type
- CE924-AT-E KVM extender Transmitter & receiver:Transmitter & receiver
- Avocent HMX8000 Digital KVM Extender Receiver – Wired:Receiver
Transmitter width
- CE924-AT-E KVM extender Transmitter & receiver:15.4 cm
- Avocent HMX8000 Digital KVM Extender Receiver – Wired:21.5 cm
Transmitter depth
- CE924-AT-E KVM extender Transmitter & receiver:17.4 cm
- Avocent HMX8000 Digital KVM Extender Receiver – Wired:4.06 cm
Transmitter height
- CE924-AT-E KVM extender Transmitter & receiver:2.88 cm
- Avocent HMX8000 Digital KVM Extender Receiver – Wired:21 cm
Transmitter weight
- CE924-AT-E KVM extender Transmitter & receiver:820 g
- Avocent HMX8000 Digital KVM Extender Receiver – Wired:1.81 kg
Operating temperature (T-T)
- CE924-AT-E KVM extender Transmitter & receiver:0 - 40 °C
- Avocent HMX8000 Digital KVM Extender Receiver – Wired:0 - 50 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)
- CE924-AT-E KVM extender Transmitter & receiver:0 - 80%
- Avocent HMX8000 Digital KVM Extender Receiver – Wired:10 - 90%

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CE924-AT-E, HMX8000R
50 specifications	A ATEN CE924-AT-E KVM extender Transmitter & receiver Model CE924-AT-E View product	B Vertiv Avocent HMX8000 Digital KVM Extender Receiver – Wired Model HMX8000R View product
Features1 differ
TypeDiffers	Transmitter & receiver	Receiver
Connectivity technology	Wired	Wired
Cable types supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Fiber
Rack mountingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Maximum digital resolution	4096 x 2160 pixels	4096 x 2160 pixels
Supported resolutionsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4K @ 60 Hz (4096 x 2160)
Product colour	Black	Black
Material	Metal	Metal
Easy to installKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Transmitteridentical
Number of displays supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
Transmitter video port typeKnown for one	DisplayPort	Unknown — not stated by the source
RJ-45 ports quantity (transmitter)Known for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Receiveridentical
Receiver local keyboard/mouse port typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB
Receiver local video port type	DisplayPort	DisplayPort
Receiver local video ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
RJ-45 ports quantity (receiver)Known for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB port type	USB Type-A	USB Type-A
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5
RJ-45 ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
PC Audio inKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
PC Audio outKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
SFP/SFP+ slots quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
Poweridentical
AC input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100-240 V
AC input frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50/60 Hz
AC adapter output voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	12 V
AC adapter output currentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 A
Power consumption (transmitter) (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20 W
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Transmitter widthDiffers	15.4 cm	21.5 cm
Transmitter depthDiffers	17.4 cm	4.06 cm
Transmitter heightDiffers	2.88 cm	21 cm
Transmitter weightDiffers	820 g	1.81 kg
Receiver widthKnown for one	15.6 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Receiver depthKnown for one	17.4 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Receiver heightKnown for one	2.88 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Receiver weightKnown for one	850 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
AC adapter included	Yes	Yes
Quick installation guideKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Cables includedKnown for one	DisplayPort, USB Type-A to USB Type-B	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs	0 - 40 °C	0 - 50 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs	0 - 80%	10 - 90%
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	-20 - 60 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	0 - 80%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Firmware upgradeableKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	84733080
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	131 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	540 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	233 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	4.04 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More kvm extender comparisons

All kvm extender comparisons