Product comparison · 2 internal solid state drives

Seagate FireCuda 510 vs Seagate IronWolf 110

19specifications compared
16differ
3identical
24known for one product only

Key differences

SSD capacity
- FireCuda 510:1 TB
- IronWolf 110:480 GB
SSD form factor
- FireCuda 510:M.2
- IronWolf 110:2.5"
Interface
- FireCuda 510:PCI Express 3.0
- IronWolf 110:Serial ATA III
NVMe
- FireCuda 510:Yes
- IronWolf 110:No
Component for
- FireCuda 510:PC
- IronWolf 110:NAS
Read speed
- FireCuda 510:3450 MB/s
- IronWolf 110:560 MB/s
Write speed
- FireCuda 510:3200 MB/s
- IronWolf 110:535 MB/s
Random read (4KB)
- FireCuda 510:620000 IOPS
- IronWolf 110:75000 IOPS

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 510, IronWolf 110
43 specifications	A Seagate FireCuda 510 Model 510 View product	B Seagate IronWolf 110 View product
Features10 differ
SSD capacityDiffers	1 TB	480 GB
SSD form factorDiffers	M.2	2.5"
InterfaceDiffers	PCI Express 3.0	Serial ATA III
NVMeDiffers	Yes	No
NVMe versionKnown for one	1.3	Unknown — not stated by the source
Memory type	3D TLC	3D TLC
Component forDiffers	PC	NAS
Hardware encryption	No	No
Read speedDiffers	3450 MB/s	560 MB/s
Write speedDiffers	3200 MB/s	535 MB/s
Random read (4KB)Differs	620000 IOPS	75000 IOPS
Random write (4KB)Differs	600000 IOPS	50000 IOPS
PCI Express interface data lanesKnown for one	x4	Unknown — not stated by the source
S.M.A.R.T. supportKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
TRIM supportKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Differs	1800000 h	2000000 h
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for one	Windows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8.1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Data transfer rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	6 Gbit/s
Read latencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	155 µs
Write latencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	40 µs
Enhanced Power Loss Data Protection technologyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Uncorrectable Bit Error Rate (UBER)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	< 1 per 10^17 bits read
TBW ratingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	875
Power2 differ
Power consumption (average)Differs	5.3 W	2.7 W
Power consumption (idle)Differs	0.02 W	1.1 W
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	22.1 mm	70.1 mm
DepthDiffers	80.2 mm	100.2 mm
HeightDiffers	3.58 mm	7 mm
WeightDiffers	8.1 g	77 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	109 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	134.2 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	24 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	62 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	0 - 70 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	-40 - 85 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating shockKnown for one	1500 G	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for one	RoHS	Unknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Master (outer) case widthKnown for one	278 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for one	129 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case heightKnown for one	169 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case net weightKnown for one	920 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Products per master (outer) case	10 pc(s)	10 pc(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal solid state drive comparisons

All internal solid state drive comparisons