Product comparison · 2 internal solid state drives

Predator GM9000 4 TB M.2 PCI Express 5.0 NVMe vs Samsung 990 SSD PCIe

14specifications compared
8differ
6identical
21known for one product only

Key differences

The Predator GM9000 4 TB M.2 PCI Express 5.0 NVMe has 2 TB more SSD capacity than the Samsung 990 SSD PCIe (4 TB vs 2 TB). The Predator GM9000 4 TB M.2 PCI Express 5.0 NVMe has 6,750 MB/s more read speed than the Samsung 990 SSD PCIe (14000 MB/s vs 7250 MB/s). The Predator GM9000 4 TB M.2 PCI Express 5.0 NVMe has 6,550 MB/s more write speed than the Samsung 990 SSD PCIe (13000 MB/s vs 6450 MB/s). Interface: PCI Express 5.0 on the Predator GM9000 4 TB M.2 PCI Express 5.0 NVMe, PCI Express 4.0 on the Samsung 990 SSD PCIe. Component for: Notebook/All-In-One on the Predator GM9000 4 TB M.2 PCI Express 5.0 NVMe, PC on the Samsung 990 SSD PCIe.

SSD capacity
- GM9000 4 TB M.2 PCI Express 5.0 NVMe:4 TB
- 990 SSD PCIe:2 TB
Interface
- GM9000 4 TB M.2 PCI Express 5.0 NVMe:PCI Express 5.0
- 990 SSD PCIe:PCI Express 4.0
Component for
- GM9000 4 TB M.2 PCI Express 5.0 NVMe:Notebook/All-In-One
- 990 SSD PCIe:PC
Read speed
- GM9000 4 TB M.2 PCI Express 5.0 NVMe:14000 MB/s
- 990 SSD PCIe:7250 MB/s
Write speed
- GM9000 4 TB M.2 PCI Express 5.0 NVMe:13000 MB/s
- 990 SSD PCIe:6450 MB/s
Width
- GM9000 4 TB M.2 PCI Express 5.0 NVMe:80 mm
- 990 SSD PCIe:80.2 mm
Depth
- GM9000 4 TB M.2 PCI Express 5.0 NVMe:25 mm
- 990 SSD PCIe:2.38 mm
Height
- GM9000 4 TB M.2 PCI Express 5.0 NVMe:22.9 mm
- 990 SSD PCIe:22.1 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of GM9000, 990
35 specifications	A Predator GM9000 4 TB M.2 PCI Express 5.0 NVMe Model GM9000 View product	B Samsung 990 SSD PCIe Model 990 View product
Features5 differ
SSD capacityDiffers	4 TB	2 TB
SSD form factor	M.2	M.2
InterfaceDiffers	PCI Express 5.0	PCI Express 4.0
NVMe	Yes	Yes
NVMe version	2.0	2.0
Memory typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	V-NAND
Component forDiffers	Notebook/All-In-One	PC
Hardware encryptionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Security algorithmsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	256-bit AES, TCG Opal 2.0
M.2 SSD size	2280 (22 x 80 mm)	2280 (22 x 80 mm)
Read speedDiffers	14000 MB/s	7250 MB/s
Write speedDiffers	13000 MB/s	6450 MB/s
Random read (4KB)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	850000 IOPS
Random write (4KB)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1200000 IOPS
PCI Express interface data lanesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	x4
DevSlp (device sleep) supportKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
PCI Express CEM revisionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4.0
S.M.A.R.T. supportKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
TRIM supportKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Mean time between failures (MTBF)	1500000 h	1500000 h
TBW ratingKnown for one	3200	Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for one	CE, FCC, RoHS, CB, KCC, BSMI, VCCI, RCM, UKCA	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Operating voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3.3 V
Power consumption (read)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4.3 W
Power consumption (write)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3.8 W
Power consumption (idle)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.055 W
Power consumption DevSlp (device sleep)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3 mW
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	80 mm	80.2 mm
DepthDiffers	25 mm	2.38 mm
HeightDiffers	22.9 mm	22.1 mm
WeightKnown for one	65 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Box
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)	0 - 70 °C	0 - 70 °C
Operating shockKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1500 G
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	-40 - 85 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal solid state drive comparisons

All internal solid state drive comparisons