Product comparison · 2 internal solid state drives

Dahua Technology SSD-C900AN500G vs Dahua Technology SSD-C970PN1TB

Add a product
  • 29specifications compared
  • 12differ
  • 17identical
  • 1known for one product only

Key differences

  • SSD capacity
    • SSD-C900AN500G:500 GB
    • SSD-C970PN1TB:1 TB
  • Interface
    • SSD-C900AN500G:PCI Express 3.0
    • SSD-C970PN1TB:PCI Express 4.0
  • NVMe version
    • SSD-C900AN500G:1.3
    • SSD-C970PN1TB:1.4
  • Memory type
    • SSD-C900AN500G:3D NAND
    • SSD-C970PN1TB:3D TLC
  • Random read (4KB)
    • SSD-C900AN500G:91000 IOPS
    • SSD-C970PN1TB:844000 IOPS
  • Random write (4KB)
    • SSD-C900AN500G:221500 IOPS
    • SSD-C970PN1TB:940000 IOPS
  • Sequential read speed (ATTO)
    • SSD-C900AN500G:2500 MB/s
    • SSD-C970PN1TB:7400 MB/s
  • Sequential write speed (ATTO)
    • SSD-C900AN500G:1000 MB/s
    • SSD-C970PN1TB:5200 MB/s

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of SSD-C900AN500G, SSD-C970PN1TB
30 specifications
A

Dahua Technology

SSD-C900AN500G

Model SSD-C900AN500G

View product
B

Dahua Technology

SSD-C970PN1TB

Model SSD-C970PN1TB

View product
Features9 differ
SSD capacityDiffers500 GB1 TB
InterfaceDiffersPCI Express 3.0PCI Express 4.0
NVMe versionDiffers1.31.4
Memory typeDiffers3D NAND3D TLC
Random read (4KB)Differs91000 IOPS844000 IOPS
Random write (4KB)Differs221500 IOPS940000 IOPS
Sequential read speed (ATTO)Differs2500 MB/s7400 MB/s
Sequential write speed (ATTO)Differs1000 MB/s5200 MB/s
TBW ratingDiffers200500
Power2 differ
Power consumption (max)Differs2.321 W5.97 W
Power consumption (average)Differs0.707 W1.88 W
Weight & dimensions1 differ
DepthDiffers22 mm220 mm
Operational conditionsidentical
Vibration resistanceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.4 G

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More internal solid state drive comparisons

All internal solid state drive comparisons