Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

GIGABYTE CMT40A0 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2 vs Manhattan 169950 interface cards/adapter Internal Serial

8specifications compared
5differ
3identical
21known for one product only

Key differences

The GIGABYTE CMT40A0 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2 has 30 mm more width than the Manhattan 169950 interface cards/adapter Internal Serial (150 mm vs 120 mm). The GIGABYTE CMT40A0 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2 has 48.9 mm more depth than the Manhattan 169950 interface cards/adapter Internal Serial (68.9 mm vs 20 mm). Output interface: M.2 on the GIGABYTE CMT40A0 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2, Serial on the Manhattan 169950 interface cards/adapter Internal Serial. Expansion card standard: PCIe 5.0 on the GIGABYTE CMT40A0 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2, PCIe 1.0 on the Manhattan 169950 interface cards/adapter Internal Serial. Product colour: Blue on the GIGABYTE CMT40A0 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2, Grey on the Manhattan 169950 interface cards/adapter Internal Serial.

Output interface
- CMT40A0 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:M.2
- 169950 interface cards/adapter Internal Serial:Serial
Expansion card standard
- CMT40A0 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:PCIe 5.0
- 169950 interface cards/adapter Internal Serial:PCIe 1.0
Product colour
- CMT40A0 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:Blue
- 169950 interface cards/adapter Internal Serial:Grey
Width
- CMT40A0 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:150 mm
- 169950 interface cards/adapter Internal Serial:120 mm
Depth
- CMT40A0 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2:68.9 mm
- 169950 interface cards/adapter Internal Serial:20 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CMT40A0, 169950
29 specifications	A GIGABYTE CMT40A0 interface cards/adapter Internal M.2 Model CMT40A0 View product	B Manhattan 169950 interface cards/adapter Internal Serial Model 169950 View product
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Output interfaceDiffers	M.2	Serial
Expansion card standardDiffers	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 1.0
Serial ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4
Serial interface typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	DB9
Host interface genderKnown for one	Male	Unknown — not stated by the source
Expansion card form factorKnown for one	Low-profile	Unknown — not stated by the source
NVMeKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of M.2 (M) slotsKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffers	Blue	Grey
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CE FCC WEEE
PurposeKnown for one	Server	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cooling typeKnown for one	Passive	Unknown — not stated by the source
Featuresidentical
ChipsetKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Exar XR17V354
BandwidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2.5 Gbit/s
FIFO (First In, First Out)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	256 B
Poweridentical
Output voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 V
Power managementKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Windows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8.1
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Federal Communications Commission (FCC), RoHS, WEEE
Weight & dimensions2 differ
WidthDiffers	150 mm	120 mm
DepthDiffers	68.9 mm	20 mm
HeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	94 mm
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	29.5 g
Packaging dataidentical
Mounting brackets includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
ManualKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface cards/adapters comparisons

All interface cards/adapters comparisons