Product comparison · 2 interface cards/adapters

Dell Emulex LPE12002 vs Manhattan 151405 interface cards/adapter USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)

8specifications compared
8differ
0identical
15known for one product only

Key differences

Host interface
- Emulex LPE12002:PCIe
- 151405 interface cards/adapter USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):ExpressCard
Output interface
- Emulex LPE12002:Fiber
- 151405 interface cards/adapter USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
Internal
- Emulex LPE12002:Yes
- 151405 interface cards/adapter USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):No
Product colour
- Emulex LPE12002:Green
- 151405 interface cards/adapter USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):Black
Data transfer rate (max)
- Emulex LPE12002:8 Gbit/s
- 151405 interface cards/adapter USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):5 Gbit/s
Depth
- Emulex LPE12002:167.6 mm
- 151405 interface cards/adapter USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):116 mm
Height
- Emulex LPE12002:68.9 mm
- 151405 interface cards/adapter USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):14 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Emulex LPE12002, 151405
23 specifications	A Dell Emulex LPE12002 View product	B Manhattan 151405 interface cards/adapter USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Model 151405 View product
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Host interfaceDiffers	PCIe	ExpressCard
Output interfaceDiffers	Fiber	USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
Expansion card standardKnown for one	PCIe 2.0	Unknown — not stated by the source
Fiber optic connectorKnown for one	LC	Unknown — not stated by the source
Connector(s)Known for one	2x Fiber 8Gb	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
Design2 differ
InternalDiffers	Yes	No
Product colourDiffers	Green	Black
CertificationKnown for one	CISPR 22 Class A, DHHS, EN55022 Class A, EMC, ICES-003 Class A, RoHS, UL 60950-1, EN 60950-1, CSA C22.2 No. 60950-1-03, FCC Part 15 A, EN 60825-1, EN55024 Class A, BSMI Class A, VCCI Class A	Unknown — not stated by the source
PurposeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Laptop
Features1 differ
Data transfer rate (max)Differs	8 Gbit/s	5 Gbit/s
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	0 - 55 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	5 - 95%	Unknown — not stated by the source
System requirements1 differ
Windows operating systems supportedDiffers	Windows Vista Business, Windows Vista Business x64, Windows Vista Enterprise, Windows Vista Enterprise x64, Windows Vista Home Basic, Windows Vista Home Basic x64, Windows Vista Home Premium, Windows Vista Home Premium x64, Windows Vista Ultimate, Windows Vista Ultimate x64	Windows 7 Home Premium, Windows 7 Home Premium x64, Windows 8, Windows 8 x64, Windows Vista Home Premium, Windows Vista Home Premium x64, Windows XP Home, Windows XP Home x64
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Server operating systems supportedKnown for one	Windows Server 2003, Windows Server 2003 x64, Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2008 x64	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions2 differ
DepthDiffers	167.6 mm	116 mm
HeightDiffers	68.9 mm	14 mm
WidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	40 mm
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	34 g
Other featuresidentical
CompatibilityKnown for one	Dell: PowerEdge R320 PowerEdge R410 PowerEdge R415 PowerEdge R420 PowerEdge R515 PowerEdge R520 PowerEdge R610 PowerEdge R620 PowerEdge R710 PowerEdge R715 PowerEdge R720 PowerEdge R810 PowerEdge R815 PowerEdge R820 PowerEdge R910 PowerEdge T320 PowerEdge T410 PowerEdge T420 PowerEdge T610 PowerEdge	Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	RoHS

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More interface cards/adapters comparisons

All interface cards/adapters comparisons