All categories

Departments

Phones & Wearables Computers & Tablets Components & Storage Networking Printing & Office Power & Charging TV, Audio & Video Gaming, Toys & Robots Kitchen Appliances Home Appliances Personal Care & Health Smart Home & Security Car & Mobility Tools & Garden Cameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categories Compare products

Product comparison · 2 hobs

Whirlpool ACM 420/IX/F vs Whirlpool ACM 426/IX/S

27specifications compared
2differ
25identical
1known for one product only

Key differences

Regular cooking zone diameter
- ACM 420/IX/F:7.5 cm
- ACM 426/IX/S:13 cm
Regular cooking zone
- ACM 420/IX/F:1650 W
- ACM 426/IX/S:3700 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of ACM 420/IX/F, ACM 426/IX/S
28 specifications	A Whirlpool ACM 420/IX/F View product	B Whirlpool ACM 426/IX/S View product
Design1 differ
Regular cooking zone diameterDiffers	7.5 cm	13 cm
Pan support materialKnown for one	Cast iron	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performance1 differ
Regular cooking zoneDiffers	1650 W	3700 W

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More hob comparisons

All hob comparisons