Product comparison · 2 hobs

Whirlpool ACM 420/IX/F vs Whirlpool ACM 426/IX/S

Add a product
  • 27specifications compared
  • 2differ
  • 25identical
  • 1known for one product only

Key differences

  • Regular cooking zone diameter
    • ACM 420/IX/F:7.5 cm
    • ACM 426/IX/S:13 cm
  • Regular cooking zone
    • ACM 420/IX/F:1650 W
    • ACM 426/IX/S:3700 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of ACM 420/IX/F, ACM 426/IX/S
28 specifications
Design1 differ
Product colourStainless steelStainless steel
Appliance placementBuilt-inBuilt-in
Hob typeGasGas
Top surface typeStainless steelStainless steel
Number of cooking zones1 zone(s)1 zone(s)
Number of gas cooking zones1 zone(s)1 zone(s)
Number of electric cooking zones0 zone(s)0 zone(s)
Cooking zone 1 typeRegularRegular
Cooking zone 1 positionCentralCentral
Cooking zone 1 power sourceGasGas
Cooking zone 1 shapeRoundRound
Regular cooking zone diameterDiffers7.5 cm13 cm
Pan support materialKnown for oneCast ironUnknown — not stated by the source
Performance1 differ
Regular cooking zoneDiffers1650 W3700 W
Ergonomicsidentical
Control typeRotaryRotary
Control positionTop rightTop right
Electronic ignitionYesYes
Residual heat indicatorNoNo
Poweridentical
AC input frequency50 Hz50 Hz
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Width400 mm400 mm
Depth400 mm400 mm
Height80 mm80 mm
Weight20 kg20 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package width485 mm485 mm
Package depth485 mm485 mm
Package height185 mm185 mm
Package weight23 kg23 kg
Other featuresidentical
DisplayNoNo

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More hob comparisons

All hob comparisons