Product comparison · 2 headphones

SHOKZ OpenMeet UC Wireless Bluetooth Bone Conduction Videoconferencing Headset with USB-A adapter vs SHOKZ OpenMeet UC Wireless Bluetooth Bone Conduction Videoconferencing Headset with USB-C adapter

Add a product
  • 61specifications compared
  • 3differ
  • 58identical
  • 1known for one product only

Key differences

  • USB connector
    • OpenMeet UC Wireless Bluetooth Bone Conduction Videoconferencing Headset with USB-A adapter:USB Type-A
    • OpenMeet UC Wireless Bluetooth Bone Conduction Videoconferencing Headset with USB-C adapter:USB Type-C
  • Master (outer) case gross weight
    • OpenMeet UC Wireless Bluetooth Bone Conduction Videoconferencing Headset with USB-A adapter:7.65 kg
    • OpenMeet UC Wireless Bluetooth Bone Conduction Videoconferencing Headset with USB-C adapter:7.66 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of C610-AA-BK, Openmeet
62 specifications
Ports & interfaces1 differ
USB connectorDiffersUSB Type-AUSB Type-C
Bluetooth versionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5.4
Logistics data1 differ
Master (outer) case gross weightDiffers7.65 kg7.66 kg
Other features1 differ
Packaging contentDiffers1 x Headset, 1 x Hard Case, 1 x USB2.0 CM-CM Data Cable, 1 x Manual, 1 x Legal Statement, 1 x Warranty Card, 2 x pairs Cushions, 1 x Shokz Loop120 (USB A adapter)1 x Headset, 1 x Hard Case, 1 x USB2.0 CM-CM Data Cable, 1 x Manual, 1 x Legal Statement, 1 x Warranty Card, 2 x Pairs of Cushions, 1 x Shokz Loop120 (USB C adapter)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More headphones comparisons

All headphones comparisons