Product comparison · 2 headphones

SHOKZ OpenMeet UC Wireless Bluetooth Bone Conduction Videoconferencing Headset with USB-A adapter vs SHOKZ OpenMeet Wireless Bluetooth Bone Conduction Videoconferencing Headset

Add a product
  • 59specifications compared
  • 2differ
  • 57identical
  • 2known for one product only

Key differences

  • Master (outer) case gross weight
    • OpenMeet UC Wireless Bluetooth Bone Conduction Videoconferencing Headset with USB-A adapter:7.65 kg
    • OpenMeet Wireless Bluetooth Bone Conduction Videoconferencing Headset:7.64 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of C610-AA-BK, C610-AN-BK
61 specifications
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB connectivityKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
USB connectorKnown for oneUSB Type-AUnknown — not stated by the source
Logistics data1 differ
Master (outer) case gross weightDiffers7.65 kg7.64 kg
Other features1 differ
Packaging contentDiffers1 x Headset, 1 x Hard Case, 1 x USB2.0 CM-CM Data Cable, 1 x Manual, 1 x Legal Statement, 1 x Warranty Card, 2 x pairs Cushions, 1 x Shokz Loop120 (USB A adapter)1 x Headset, 1 x Hard Case, 1 x USB2.0 CM-CM Data Cable, 1 x Manual, 1 x Legal Statement, 1 x Warranty Card, 2 x Pairs of Cushions

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More headphones comparisons

All headphones comparisons