Zyxel ATP200 hardware firewall Desktop 2 Gbit/s vs Zyxel VPN50 hardware firewall 0.8 Gbit/s

Key differences

The Zyxel ATP200 hardware firewall Desktop 2 Gbit/s has 1.2 Gbit/s more firewall throughput than the Zyxel VPN50 hardware firewall 0.8 Gbit/s (2 Gbit/s vs 0.8 Gbit/s). The Zyxel ATP200 hardware firewall Desktop 2 Gbit/s has 0.35 Gbit/s more VPN throughput than the Zyxel VPN50 hardware firewall 0.8 Gbit/s (0.5 Gbit/s vs 0.15 Gbit/s). The Zyxel ATP200 hardware firewall Desktop 2 Gbit/s has 4.46 BTU/h more heat dissipation than the Zyxel VPN50 hardware firewall 0.8 Gbit/s (45.38 BTU/h vs 40.92 BTU/h). Dimensions (WxDxH): 272 x 187 x 36 mm on the Zyxel ATP200 hardware firewall Desktop 2 Gbit/s, 216 x 143 x 33 mm on the Zyxel VPN50 hardware firewall 0.8 Gbit/s. Weight: 1.4 kg on the Zyxel ATP200 hardware firewall Desktop 2 Gbit/s, 880 g on the Zyxel VPN50 hardware firewall 0.8 Gbit/s.

• Firewall throughput
  • ATP200 hardware firewall Desktop 2 Gbit/s:2 Gbit/s
  • VPN50 hardware firewall 0.8 Gbit/s:0.8 Gbit/s
• VPN throughput
  • ATP200 hardware firewall Desktop 2 Gbit/s:0.5 Gbit/s
  • VPN50 hardware firewall 0.8 Gbit/s:0.15 Gbit/s
• Heat dissipation
  • ATP200 hardware firewall Desktop 2 Gbit/s:45.38 BTU/h
  • VPN50 hardware firewall 0.8 Gbit/s:40.92 BTU/h
• Mean time between failures (MTBF)
  • ATP200 hardware firewall Desktop 2 Gbit/s:529688.2 h
  • VPN50 hardware firewall 0.8 Gbit/s:44000 h
• USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantity
  • ATP200 hardware firewall Desktop 2 Gbit/s:2
  • VPN50 hardware firewall 0.8 Gbit/s:1
• Ethernet DMZ ports quantity
  • ATP200 hardware firewall Desktop 2 Gbit/s:1
  • VPN50 hardware firewall 0.8 Gbit/s:4
• Input current
  • ATP200 hardware firewall Desktop 2 Gbit/s:2.5 A
  • VPN50 hardware firewall 0.8 Gbit/s:2 A
• Power consumption (typical)
  • ATP200 hardware firewall Desktop 2 Gbit/s:13.3 W
  • VPN50 hardware firewall 0.8 Gbit/s:12 W