Product comparison · 2 hardware firewalls

Zyxel ATP200 hardware firewall Desktop 2 Gbit/s vs Zyxel VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s

13specifications compared
10differ
3identical
35known for one product only

Key differences

The Zyxel ATP200 hardware firewall Desktop 2 Gbit/s has 1.15 Gbit/s more firewall throughput than the Zyxel VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s (2 Gbit/s vs 0.85 Gbit/s). The Zyxel ATP200 hardware firewall Desktop 2 Gbit/s has 0.68 BTU/h more heat dissipation than the Zyxel VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s (45.38 BTU/h vs 44.7 BTU/h). The Zyxel ATP200 hardware firewall Desktop 2 Gbit/s has 485,688.2 h more mean time between failures (MTBF) than the Zyxel VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s (529688.2 h vs 44000 h). Storage temperature (T-T): -30 - 70 °C on the Zyxel ATP200 hardware firewall Desktop 2 Gbit/s, -30 - 60 °C on the Zyxel VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s. Operating relative humidity (H-H): 10 - 90% on the Zyxel ATP200 hardware firewall Desktop 2 Gbit/s, 20 - 95% on the Zyxel VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s.

Firewall throughput
- ATP200 hardware firewall Desktop 2 Gbit/s:2 Gbit/s
- VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s:0.85 Gbit/s
Heat dissipation
- ATP200 hardware firewall Desktop 2 Gbit/s:45.38 BTU/h
- VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s:44.7 BTU/h
Mean time between failures (MTBF)
- ATP200 hardware firewall Desktop 2 Gbit/s:529688.2 h
- VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s:44000 h
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
- ATP200 hardware firewall Desktop 2 Gbit/s:4
- VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s:3
Power consumption (typical)
- ATP200 hardware firewall Desktop 2 Gbit/s:13.3 W
- VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s:13.1 W
Storage temperature (T-T)
- ATP200 hardware firewall Desktop 2 Gbit/s:-30 - 70 °C
- VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s:-30 - 60 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)
- ATP200 hardware firewall Desktop 2 Gbit/s:10 - 90%
- VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s:20 - 95%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)
- ATP200 hardware firewall Desktop 2 Gbit/s:10 - 90%
- VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s:20 - 95%

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of ATP200, VPN2S
48 specifications	A Zyxel ATP200 hardware firewall Desktop 2 Gbit/s Model ATP200 View product	B Zyxel VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s Model VPN2S View product
Data transmission1 differ
Firewall throughputDiffers	2 Gbit/s	0.85 Gbit/s
VPN throughputKnown for one	0.5 Gbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
IPSec VPN throughputKnown for one	40 Gbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
SSL performanceKnown for one	10 transactions/sec	Unknown — not stated by the source
UTM throughput (fast/full scan)Known for one	450/450 Gbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum connections (SPI)Known for one	2000	Unknown — not stated by the source
HTTPS encryptionKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performance2 differ
Heat dissipationDiffers	45.38 BTU/h	44.7 BTU/h
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Differs	529688.2 h	44000 h
Networkidentical
Active TCP connections (max)Known for one	600000	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of VLANsKnown for one	16	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of usersKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50000 user(s)
VPN tunnels quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20
Securityidentical
Stateful Packet Inspection (SPI)Known for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Content filteringKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Management featuresidentical
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
On/off switchKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Connectivity technologyKnown for one	Wired	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers	4	3
Ethernet LAN data rates	10,100,1000 Mbit/s	10,100,1000 Mbit/s
Number of console portsKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet DMZ ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
SFP module slots quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
WAN connection	Ethernet (RJ-45)	Ethernet (RJ-45)
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
Designidentical
Rack mountingKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Form factorKnown for one	Desktop	Unknown — not stated by the source
Built-in fanKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Input currentKnown for one	2.5 A	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (typical)Differs	13.3 W	13.1 W
AC input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	110 - 240 V
AC input frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50 - 60 Hz
Certificatesidentical
CertificationKnown for one	FCC Part 15 (Class B), CE EMC (Class B), C-Tick (Class B), BSMI, LVD (EN60950-1), BSMI	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions3 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)	0 - 40 °C	0 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Differs	-30 - 70 °C	-30 - 60 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs	10 - 90%	20 - 95%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Differs	10 - 90%	20 - 95%
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	272 x 187 x 36 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers	1.4 kg	1.13 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	427 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	73 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	247 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	2.42 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Rack mount kitKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one	85176990	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other features1 differ
Firewall throughputDiffers	2000 Mbit/s	850 Mbit/s
VPN throughputKnown for one	500 Mbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More hardware firewall comparisons

All hardware firewall comparisons