Product comparison · 2 hardware firewalls

Zyxel ATP100W hardware firewall Desktop 1 Gbit/s vs Zyxel VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s

Add a product
  • 12specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 2identical
  • 37known for one product only

Key differences

The Zyxel ATP100W hardware firewall Desktop 1 Gbit/s has 0.15 Gbit/s more firewall throughput than the Zyxel VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s (1 Gbit/s vs 0.85 Gbit/s). The Zyxel VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s has 2.05 BTU/h more heat dissipation than the Zyxel ATP100W hardware firewall Desktop 1 Gbit/s (44.7 BTU/h vs 42.65 BTU/h). The Zyxel ATP100W hardware firewall Desktop 1 Gbit/s has 945,810.8 h more mean time between failures (MTBF) than the Zyxel VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s (989810.8 h vs 44000 h). Number of users: 30 user(s) on the Zyxel ATP100W hardware firewall Desktop 1 Gbit/s, 50000 user(s) on the Zyxel VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s. Storage temperature (T-T): -30 - 70 °C on the Zyxel ATP100W hardware firewall Desktop 1 Gbit/s, -30 - 60 °C on the Zyxel VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s.

  • Firewall throughput
    • ATP100W hardware firewall Desktop 1 Gbit/s:1 Gbit/s
    • VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s:0.85 Gbit/s
  • Heat dissipation
    • ATP100W hardware firewall Desktop 1 Gbit/s:42.65 BTU/h
    • VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s:44.7 BTU/h
  • Mean time between failures (MTBF)
    • ATP100W hardware firewall Desktop 1 Gbit/s:989810.8 h
    • VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s:44000 h
  • Number of users
    • ATP100W hardware firewall Desktop 1 Gbit/s:30 user(s)
    • VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s:50000 user(s)
  • VPN tunnels quantity
    • ATP100W hardware firewall Desktop 1 Gbit/s:40
    • VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s:20
  • Storage temperature (T-T)
    • ATP100W hardware firewall Desktop 1 Gbit/s:-30 - 70 °C
    • VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s:-30 - 60 °C
  • Operating relative humidity (H-H)
    • ATP100W hardware firewall Desktop 1 Gbit/s:10 - 90%
    • VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s:20 - 95%
  • Storage relative humidity (H-H)
    • ATP100W hardware firewall Desktop 1 Gbit/s:10 - 90%
    • VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s:20 - 95%

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of ATP100W, VPN2S
49 specifications
Data transmission1 differ
Firewall throughputDiffers1 Gbit/s0.85 Gbit/s
VPN throughputKnown for one0.3 Gbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Performance2 differ
Heat dissipationDiffers42.65 BTU/h44.7 BTU/h
Antenna gain level (max)Known for one3 dBiUnknown — not stated by the source
Antennas quantityKnown for one3Unknown — not stated by the source
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Differs989810.8 h44000 h
Network2 differ
Wi-FiKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Wi-Fi standardsKnown for one802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)Unknown — not stated by the source
Wi-Fi data rate (max)Known for one1300 Mbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Networking standardsKnown for oneIEEE 802.11a, IEEE 802.11ac, IEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11nUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of usersDiffers30 user(s)50000 user(s)
VPN tunnels quantityDiffers4020
Active TCP connections (max)Known for one300000Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of VLANsKnown for one8Unknown — not stated by the source
Securityidentical
Security algorithmsKnown for oneHTTPS, IPSec, SSL/TLSUnknown — not stated by the source
Stateful Packet Inspection (SPI)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Connectivity technologyKnown for oneWired & WirelessUnknown — not stated by the source
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports33
Console portKnown for oneRJ-45Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of console portsKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet DMZ ports quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
SFP module slots quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
Ethernet LAN data ratesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10,100,1000 Mbit/s
WAN connectionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceEthernet (RJ-45)
Designidentical
Form factorKnown for oneDesktopUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Input currentKnown for one2 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (max)Known for one12.5 WUnknown — not stated by the source
AC input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source110 - 240 V
AC input frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50 - 60 Hz
Power consumption (typical)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source13.1 W
Certificatesidentical
CertificationKnown for oneFCC, CE EMC, BSMI, LVDUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions3 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)0 - 40 °C0 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Differs-30 - 70 °C-30 - 60 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs10 - 90%20 - 95%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Differs10 - 90%20 - 95%
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthKnown for one216 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one147.3 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one33 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers850 g1.13 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one284 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one190 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one100 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one1.4 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneAC, LAN (RJ-45), RS-232Unknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one85176990Unknown — not stated by the source
Other features1 differ
Firewall throughputDiffers1000 Mbit/s850 Mbit/s
VPN throughputKnown for one300 Mbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More hardware firewall comparisons

All hardware firewall comparisons