Product comparison · 2 hardware firewalls

TERRA "BLACK DWARF" G3 UTM vs Zyxel NSG50 hardware firewall

7specifications compared
3differ
4identical
23known for one product only

Key differences

The TERRA "BLACK DWARF" G3 UTM has 7 W more power consumption (typical) than the Zyxel NSG50 hardware firewall (19 W vs 12 W). The Zyxel NSG50 hardware firewall has 0.04 kg more weight than the TERRA "BLACK DWARF" G3 UTM (1.04 kg vs 1 kg). Dimensions (WxDxH): 200 x 105 x 44 mm on the TERRA "BLACK DWARF" G3 UTM, 216 x 143 x 33 mm on the Zyxel NSG50 hardware firewall.

Power consumption (typical)
- "BLACK DWARF" G3 UTM:19 W
- NSG50 hardware firewall:12 W
Dimensions (WxDxH)
- "BLACK DWARF" G3 UTM:200 x 105 x 44 mm
- NSG50 hardware firewall:216 x 143 x 33 mm
Weight
- "BLACK DWARF" G3 UTM:1 kg
- NSG50 hardware firewall:1.04 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of "BLACK DWARF" G3 UTM, NSG50
30 specifications	A TERRA "BLACK DWARF" G3 UTM View product	B Zyxel NSG50 hardware firewall Model NSG50 View product
Data transmissionidentical
Maximum data transfer rateKnown for one	1 Gbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
Firewall throughputKnown for one	0.1 Gbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Heat dissipationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	40.95 BTU/h
Antennas quantityKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Networkidentical
Number of VLANsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	8
Number of usersKnown for one	10 user(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Securityidentical
VPN supportKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	IPSec, L2TP over IPSec
Ports & interfacesidentical
Ethernet LAN data ratesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10,100,1000 Mbit/s
Connectivity technologyKnown for one	Wired & Wireless	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one	3	Unknown — not stated by the source
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	19 W	12 W
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-30 - 70 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 90%
Weight & dimensions2 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	200 x 105 x 44 mm	216 x 143 x 33 mm
WeightDiffers	1 kg	1.04 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	276 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	98 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	185 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.41 kg
Other featuresidentical
Firewall throughputKnown for one	100 Mbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum data transfer rateKnown for one	1000 Mbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
Management featuresidentical
LED indicatorsKnown for one	HDD, LAN, Power	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More hardware firewall comparisons

All hardware firewall comparisons