Allied Telesis AT-AR4050S-30 hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s vs Zyxel USG Flex 100HP

Key differences

The Zyxel USG Flex 100HP has 1.1 Gbit/s more firewall throughput than the Allied Telesis AT-AR4050S-30 hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s (3 Gbit/s vs 1.9 Gbit/s). The Zyxel USG Flex 100HP has 750 Mbit/s more IPS/IDS throughput than the Allied Telesis AT-AR4050S-30 hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s (1500 Mbit/s vs 750 Mbit/s). The Allied Telesis AT-AR4050S-30 hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s has 0.65 kg more weight than the Zyxel USG Flex 100HP (1.7 kg vs 1.05 kg). Operating temperature (T-T): 0 - 50 °C on the Allied Telesis AT-AR4050S-30 hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s, 0 - 40 °C on the Zyxel USG Flex 100HP. Storage temperature (T-T): -25 - 70 °C on the Allied Telesis AT-AR4050S-30 hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s, -30 - 70 °C on the Zyxel USG Flex 100HP.

• Firewall throughput
  • AT-AR4050S-30 hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s:1.9 Gbit/s
  • USG Flex 100HP:3 Gbit/s
• IPS/IDS throughput
  • AT-AR4050S-30 hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s:750 Mbit/s
  • USG Flex 100HP:1500 Mbit/s
• Operating temperature (T-T)
  • AT-AR4050S-30 hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s:0 - 50 °C
  • USG Flex 100HP:0 - 40 °C
• Storage temperature (T-T)
  • AT-AR4050S-30 hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s:-25 - 70 °C
  • USG Flex 100HP:-30 - 70 °C
• Operating relative humidity (H-H)
  • AT-AR4050S-30 hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s:5 - 80%
  • USG Flex 100HP:10 - 90%
• Storage relative humidity (H-H)
  • AT-AR4050S-30 hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s:5 - 95%
  • USG Flex 100HP:10 - 90%
• Weight
  • AT-AR4050S-30 hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s:1.7 kg
  • USG Flex 100HP:1.05 kg