Allied Telesis AT-AR2010V-30 hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s vs Zyxel USG Flex 200

Key differences

The Zyxel USG Flex 200 has 1.05 Gbit/s more firewall throughput than the Allied Telesis AT-AR2010V-30 hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s (1.8 Gbit/s vs 0.75 Gbit/s). The Zyxel USG Flex 200 has 0.05 Gbit/s more VPN throughput than the Allied Telesis AT-AR2010V-30 hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s (0.45 Gbit/s vs 0.4 Gbit/s). The Zyxel USG Flex 200 has 0.3 W more power consumption (max) than the Allied Telesis AT-AR2010V-30 hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s (13.3 W vs 13 W). Console port: RJ-45 on the Allied Telesis AT-AR2010V-30 hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s, DB9 on the Zyxel USG Flex 200. Operating temperature (T-T): 0 - 50 °C on the Allied Telesis AT-AR2010V-30 hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s, 0 - 40 °C on the Zyxel USG Flex 200.

• Firewall throughput
  • AT-AR2010V-30 hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s:0.75 Gbit/s
  • USG Flex 200:1.8 Gbit/s
• VPN throughput
  • AT-AR2010V-30 hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s:0.4 Gbit/s
  • USG Flex 200:0.45 Gbit/s
• Console port
  • AT-AR2010V-30 hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s:RJ-45
  • USG Flex 200:DB9
• Power consumption (max)
  • AT-AR2010V-30 hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s:13 W
  • USG Flex 200:13.3 W
• Operating temperature (T-T)
  • AT-AR2010V-30 hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s:0 - 50 °C
  • USG Flex 200:0 - 40 °C
• Storage temperature (T-T)
  • AT-AR2010V-30 hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s:-25 - 70 °C
  • USG Flex 200:-30 - 70 °C
• Operating relative humidity (H-H)
  • AT-AR2010V-30 hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s:5 - 80%
  • USG Flex 200:10 - 90%
• Storage relative humidity (H-H)
  • AT-AR2010V-30 hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s:5 - 95%
  • USG Flex 200:10 - 90%