TP-Link AC500 Wireless Controller vs TP-Link Omada Hardware Controller

Key differences

The TP-Link AC500 Wireless Controller has 248 MB more internal memory than the TP-Link Omada Hardware Controller (256 MB vs 8 MB). The TP-Link AC500 Wireless Controller has 1 more Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports than the TP-Link Omada Hardware Controller (5 vs 4). The TP-Link AC500 Wireless Controller has 40 mm more depth than the TP-Link Omada Hardware Controller (220 mm vs 180 mm). Product colour: Black on the TP-Link AC500 Wireless Controller, Grey on the TP-Link Omada Hardware Controller. LED indicators: Activity, Link, Power, System on the TP-Link AC500 Wireless Controller, Yes on the TP-Link Omada Hardware Controller.

• Product colour
  • AC500 Wireless Controller:Black
  • Omada Hardware Controller:Grey
• Internal memory
  • AC500 Wireless Controller:256 MB
  • Omada Hardware Controller:8 MB
• Internal memory type
  • AC500 Wireless Controller:DDR3
  • Omada Hardware Controller:DDR4
• Ethernet LAN data rates
  • AC500 Wireless Controller:10,100,1000 Mbit/s
  • Omada Hardware Controller:1000,10000 Mbit/s
• Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
  • AC500 Wireless Controller:5
  • Omada Hardware Controller:4
• Input voltage
  • AC500 Wireless Controller:100-240 V
  • Omada Hardware Controller:100 - 240 V
• Depth
  • AC500 Wireless Controller:220 mm
  • Omada Hardware Controller:180 mm
• Cables included
  • AC500 Wireless Controller:AC
  • Omada Hardware Controller:LAN (RJ-45), Power