Product comparison · 2 gateways/controllers

TP-Link AC500 Wireless Controller vs TP-Link Omada Cloud Controller

Add a product
  • 24specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 14identical
  • 21known for one product only

Key differences

  • Internal memory
    • AC500 Wireless Controller:256 MB
    • Omada Cloud Controller:1024 MB
  • Ethernet LAN data rates
    • AC500 Wireless Controller:10,100,1000 Mbit/s
    • Omada Cloud Controller:10,100 Mbit/s
  • Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
    • AC500 Wireless Controller:5
    • Omada Cloud Controller:2
  • Input voltage
    • AC500 Wireless Controller:100-240 V
    • Omada Cloud Controller:5 V
  • Depth
    • AC500 Wireless Controller:220 mm
    • Omada Cloud Controller:98 mm
  • Height
    • AC500 Wireless Controller:44 mm
    • Omada Cloud Controller:25 mm
  • Width
    • AC500 Wireless Controller:440 mm
    • Omada Cloud Controller:99.8 mm
  • Cables included
    • AC500 Wireless Controller:AC
    • Omada Cloud Controller:LAN (RJ-45)

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of AC500 Wireless Controller, OC200
45 specifications
Design1 differ
Product colourBlackBlack
LED indicatorsDiffersActivity, Link, Power, SystemYes
Performance1 differ
Control display unitKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Built-in processorYesYes
Processor frequency1000 MHz1000 MHz
Number of processors installed11
Internal memoryDiffers256 MB1024 MB
Internal memory typeDDR3DDR3
Flash memoryKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4000 MB
Network1 differ
Ethernet LAN data ratesDiffers10,100,1000 Mbit/s10,100 Mbit/s
Networking standardsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIEEE 802.3af, IEEE 802.3at
Security1 differ
MAC address filteringKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Security algorithmsDiffers802.1x RADIUS, SSID, WPA, WPA2SSID, WEP, WPA, WPA-PSK, WPA2, WPA2-PSK
VLAN supportYesYes
Ports & interfaces1 differ
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers52
Console portKnown for oneRJ-45Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of console portsKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Management featuresidentical
Management platformKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceL3
Reset buttonKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
SyslogYesYes
Web-based managementYesYes
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 W
Input voltageDiffers100-240 V5 V
Input currentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 A
DC input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 V
Power over Ethernet (PoE)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Input frequencyKnown for one50/60 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Softwareidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWindows10, 8, 7,Vista, XP; MAC OS; NetWare, UNIX; Linux
Weight & dimensions3 differ
DepthDiffers220 mm98 mm
HeightDiffers44 mm25 mm
WidthDiffers440 mm99.8 mm
Packaging dataidentical
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source128 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source70 mm
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source135 mm
Package typeKnown for oneBoxUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging content1 differ
Cables includedDiffersACLAN (RJ-45)
Quick installation guideYesYes
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)0 - 40 °C0 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)-40 - 70 °C-40 - 70 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)10 - 90%10 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)5 - 90%5 - 90%
Certificatesidentical
CertificationCE, FCC, RoHSCE, FCC, RoHS
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source85176990
Protocolsidentical
DHCP serverKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More gateways/controllers comparisons

All gateways/controllers comparisons