Product comparison · 2 gateways/controllers

D-Link DSH-G300 gateway/controller 10, 100 Mbit/s vs TP-Link Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s

Add a product
  • 14specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 4identical
  • 10known for one product only

Key differences

The TP-Link Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s has 1 more Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports than the D-Link DSH-G300 gateway/controller 10, 100 Mbit/s (2 vs 1). The TP-Link Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s has 9 mm more depth than the D-Link DSH-G300 gateway/controller 10, 100 Mbit/s (98 mm vs 89 mm). The D-Link DSH-G300 gateway/controller 10, 100 Mbit/s has 2 mm more height than the TP-Link Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s (27 mm vs 25 mm). Product colour: White on the D-Link DSH-G300 gateway/controller 10, 100 Mbit/s, Black on the TP-Link Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s. Ethernet LAN data rates: 10,100 Mbit/s on the D-Link DSH-G300 gateway/controller 10, 100 Mbit/s, 10,100,1000 Mbit/s on the TP-Link Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s.

  • Product colour
    • DSH-G300 gateway/controller 10, 100 Mbit/s:White
    • Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:Black
  • Ethernet LAN data rates
    • DSH-G300 gateway/controller 10, 100 Mbit/s:10,100 Mbit/s
    • Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:10,100,1000 Mbit/s
  • Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
    • DSH-G300 gateway/controller 10, 100 Mbit/s:1
    • Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:2
  • Depth
    • DSH-G300 gateway/controller 10, 100 Mbit/s:89 mm
    • Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:98 mm
  • Height
    • DSH-G300 gateway/controller 10, 100 Mbit/s:27 mm
    • Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:25 mm
  • Width
    • DSH-G300 gateway/controller 10, 100 Mbit/s:89 mm
    • Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:100 mm
  • Operating temperature (T-T)
    • DSH-G300 gateway/controller 10, 100 Mbit/s:0 - 40 °C
    • Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:-5 - 50 °C
  • Storage temperature (T-T)
    • DSH-G300 gateway/controller 10, 100 Mbit/s:-20 - 70 °C
    • Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:-40 - 70 °C

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of DSH-G300, OC220
24 specifications
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffersWhiteBlack
WPS push buttonKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsYesYes
Featuresidentical
Antenna typeKnown for oneInternalUnknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Control display unitNoNo
Internal memoryKnown for one128 MBUnknown — not stated by the source
Flash memoryKnown for one64 MBUnknown — not stated by the source
Network1 differ
Ethernet LAN data ratesDiffers10,100 Mbit/s10,100,1000 Mbit/s
Networking standardsKnown for oneIEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11nUnknown — not stated by the source
Frequency bandKnown for one2.4 - 2.4835 GHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
USB 2.0 ports quantity11
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers12
Management featuresidentical
Reset buttonYesYes
Poweridentical
Input voltageKnown for one100 - 240 VUnknown — not stated by the source
Input frequencyKnown for one50/60 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
DepthDiffers89 mm98 mm
HeightDiffers27 mm25 mm
WidthDiffers89 mm100 mm
WeightKnown for one80 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions4 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs0 - 40 °C-5 - 50 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Differs-20 - 70 °C-40 - 70 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs20 - 90%10 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Differs5 - 95%5 - 90%
Softwareidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWindows 7/8/10/11, Vista, XP or MAC OS, NetWare, UNIX or Linux

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More gateways/controllers comparisons

All gateways/controllers comparisons