Product comparison · 2 fingerprint readers

HP Retail Integrated Fingerprint Reader vs HP QZ672AT fingerprint reader USB 2.0 Black

8specifications compared
1differ
7identical
4known for one product only

Key differences

Dimensions (WxDxH)
- Retail Integrated Fingerprint Reader:99.98 x 77.8 x 34 mm
- QZ672AT fingerprint reader USB 2.0 Black:77.8 x 99.98 x 34 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of QZ672AA, QZ672AT
12 specifications	A HP Retail Integrated Fingerprint Reader Model QZ672AA View product	B HP QZ672AT fingerprint reader USB 2.0 Black Model QZ672AT View product
Technical detailsidentical
Interface	USB 2.0	USB 2.0
Scan area	14.6 x 18.1 mm	14.6 x 18.1 mm
Greyscale levels	256	256
Maximum scan resolutionKnown for one	512	Unknown — not stated by the source
HP segmentKnown for one	Business	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Weight	96 g	96 g
Poweridentical
Power consumption	100 mA	100 mA
Colouridentical
Product colour	Black	Black
Other features1 differ
Compatible operating systems	Microsoft Windows 7 Professional Microsoft Windows 7 Professional 32-bit Microsoft Windows 7 Professional 64-bit Microsoft Windows Embedded POSReady 2009 Microsoft Windows Embedded POSReady 7 32-bit Microsoft Windows Embedded POSReady 7 64-bit Microsoft Windows XP Professional	Microsoft Windows 7 Professional Microsoft Windows 7 Professional 32-bit Microsoft Windows 7 Professional 64-bit Microsoft Windows Embedded POSReady 2009 Microsoft Windows Embedded POSReady 7 32-bit Microsoft Windows Embedded POSReady 7 64-bit Microsoft Windows XP Professional
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	99.98 x 77.8 x 34 mm	77.8 x 99.98 x 34 mm
Softwareidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
System requirementsidentical
Minimum system requirementsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	HP RP7 7800

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More fingerprint reader comparisons

All fingerprint reader comparisons