All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 fingerprint readers

HP N3R64AA fingerprint reader USB 2.0 Black vs HP QZ672AT fingerprint reader USB 2.0 Black

Add a product
  • 5specifications compared
  • 3differ
  • 2identical
  • 7known for one product only

Key differences

  • Scan area
    • 18 x 12.8 mm
    • 14.6 x 18.1 mm
  • Weight
    • 44.8 g
    • 96 g
  • Dimensions (WxDxH)
    • 59 x 63.23 x 37.43 mm
    • 77.8 x 99.98 x 34 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
12 specifications
A

HP

N3R64AA fingerprint reader USB 2.0 Black

Model N3R64AA

View product
B

HP

QZ672AT fingerprint reader USB 2.0 Black

Model QZ672AT

View product
Technical details1 differ
InterfaceUSB 2.0USB 2.0
Scan areaDiffers18 x 12.8 mm14.6 x 18.1 mm
Greyscale levelsKnown for one256
HP segmentKnown for oneBusiness
Softwareidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneYes
System requirementsidentical
Minimum system requirementsKnown for oneHP RP7 7800
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers44.8 g96 g
Poweridentical
Power consumptionKnown for one100 mA
USB poweredKnown for oneYes
Colouridentical
Product colourBlackBlack
Other features1 differ
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneMicrosoft Windows 7 Professional Microsoft Windows 7 Professional 32-bit Microsoft Windows 7 Professional 64-bit Microsoft Windows Embedded POSReady 2009 Microsoft Windows Embedded POSReady 7 32-bit Microsoft Windows Embedded POSReady 7 64-bit Microsoft Windows XP Professional
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs59 x 63.23 x 37.43 mm77.8 x 99.98 x 34 mm

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More fingerprint reader comparisons

All fingerprint reader comparisons