Product comparison · 2 disk arrays

Dell PowerVault ME5024 disk array vs Fujitsu ETERNUS CS800 M1

11specifications compared
6differ
5identical
18known for one product only

Key differences

The Dell PowerVault ME5024 disk array has 0.36 TB more total installed storage capacity than the Fujitsu ETERNUS CS800 M1 (15.36 TB vs 15 TB). The Fujitsu ETERNUS CS800 M1 has 234.6 mm more width than the Dell PowerVault ME5024 disk array (717.6 mm vs 483 mm). The Dell PowerVault ME5024 disk array has 136.7 mm more depth than the Fujitsu ETERNUS CS800 M1 (618.7 mm vs 482 mm). Installed storage drive type: SSD on the Dell PowerVault ME5024 disk array, HDD on the Fujitsu ETERNUS CS800 M1.

Installed storage drive type
- PowerVault ME5024 disk array:SSD
- ETERNUS CS800 M1:HDD
Total installed storage capacity
- PowerVault ME5024 disk array:15.36 TB
- ETERNUS CS800 M1:15 TB
Width
- PowerVault ME5024 disk array:483 mm
- ETERNUS CS800 M1:717.6 mm
Depth
- PowerVault ME5024 disk array:618.7 mm
- ETERNUS CS800 M1:482 mm
Height
- PowerVault ME5024 disk array:87.9 mm
- ETERNUS CS800 M1:86.8 mm
Operating temperature (T-T)
- PowerVault ME5024 disk array:5 - 35 °C
- ETERNUS CS800 M1:15 - 35 °C

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of ME5024, ETERNUS CS800 M1
29 specifications	A Dell PowerVault ME5024 disk array Model ME5024 View product	B Fujitsu ETERNUS CS800 M1 View product
Storage2 differ
Installed storage drive typeDiffers	SSD	HDD
Number of storage drives installedKnown for one	4	Unknown — not stated by the source
Total installed storage capacityDiffers	15.36 TB	15 TB
Number of storage drives supportedKnown for one	24	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage drive capacityKnown for one	3.84 TB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage drive interfaceKnown for one	Serial Attached SCSI (SAS)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Data transfer rateKnown for one	24 Gbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum supported storage capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	230 TB
Ports & interfacesidentical
SFP+ module slots quantityKnown for one	8	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Device classKnown for one	Large Enterprise Business	Unknown — not stated by the source
Product colourKnown for one	Black	Unknown — not stated by the source
Rack railsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Noise levelKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	72 dB
Performanceidentical
Bytes per sectorKnown for one	512e	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	483 mm	717.6 mm
DepthDiffers	618.7 mm	482 mm
HeightDiffers	87.9 mm	86.8 mm
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	25.4 kg
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs	5 - 35 °C	15 - 35 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	-40 - 70 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	5 - 100%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating altitudeKnown for one	0 - 3000 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Non-operating altitudeKnown for one	-100 - 12192 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Controller interface typeKnown for one	32Gb FC Type-B 8 Port Dual Controller	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More disk array comparisons

All disk array comparisons