ATEN VK258 control processor vs Biamp Cambridge QT-100

Key differences

The Biamp Cambridge QT-100 has 1 more Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports than the ATEN VK258 control processor (2 vs 1). The Biamp Cambridge QT-100 has 4.25 W more power consumption (max) than the ATEN VK258 control processor (7 W vs 2.75 W). The Biamp Cambridge QT-100 has 103.2 mm more width than the ATEN VK258 control processor (179 mm vs 75.8 mm). Only the Biamp Cambridge QT-100 has built-in display. Product colour: Black on the ATEN VK258 control processor, Grey, Black on the Biamp Cambridge QT-100.

• Product colour
  • VK258 control processor:Black
  • Cambridge QT-100:Grey, Black
• Built-in display
  • VK258 control processor:No
  • Cambridge QT-100:Yes
• Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
  • VK258 control processor:1
  • Cambridge QT-100:2
• Operating temperature (T-T)
  • VK258 control processor:0 - 50 °C
  • Cambridge QT-100:4 - 40 °C
• Operating relative humidity (H-H)
  • VK258 control processor:0 - 80%
  • Cambridge QT-100:0 - 95%
• Power consumption (max)
  • VK258 control processor:2.75 W
  • Cambridge QT-100:7 W
• Width
  • VK258 control processor:75.8 mm
  • Cambridge QT-100:179 mm
• Depth
  • VK258 control processor:130 mm
  • Cambridge QT-100:23 mm