Product comparison · 2 computer cooling systems

ARCTIC Liquid Freezer WS360-SP5 Processor All-in-one liquid cooler vs Zolyd Hyperflow ARGB 240 mm

Add a product
  • 28specifications compared
  • 17differ
  • 11identical
  • 37known for one product only

Key differences

The ARCTIC Liquid Freezer WS360-SP5 Processor All-in-one liquid cooler has 35.11 m³/h more airflow than the Zolyd Hyperflow ARGB 240 mm (131 m³/h vs 95.89 m³/h). The ARCTIC Liquid Freezer WS360-SP5 Processor All-in-one liquid cooler has 1,400 RPM more fan speed (max) than the Zolyd Hyperflow ARGB 240 mm (3000 RPM vs 1600 RPM). The ARCTIC Liquid Freezer WS360-SP5 Processor All-in-one liquid cooler has 0.14 A more fan current than the Zolyd Hyperflow ARGB 240 mm (0.33 A vs 0.19 A). Only the Zolyd Hyperflow ARGB 240 mm has illumination LED. Bearing type: Dual ball bearing on the ARCTIC Liquid Freezer WS360-SP5 Processor All-in-one liquid cooler, Hydraulic on the Zolyd Hyperflow ARGB 240 mm.

  • Airflow
    • Liquid Freezer WS360-SP5 Processor All-in-one liquid cooler:131 m³/h
    • Hyperflow ARGB 240 mm:95.89 m³/h
  • Bearing type
    • Liquid Freezer WS360-SP5 Processor All-in-one liquid cooler:Dual ball bearing
    • Hyperflow ARGB 240 mm:Hydraulic
  • Fan speed (max)
    • Liquid Freezer WS360-SP5 Processor All-in-one liquid cooler:3000 RPM
    • Hyperflow ARGB 240 mm:1600 RPM
  • Number of fans
    • Liquid Freezer WS360-SP5 Processor All-in-one liquid cooler:3 fan(s)
    • Hyperflow ARGB 240 mm:2 fan(s)
  • Illumination LED
    • Liquid Freezer WS360-SP5 Processor All-in-one liquid cooler:No
    • Hyperflow ARGB 240 mm:Yes
  • Fan connector
    • Liquid Freezer WS360-SP5 Processor All-in-one liquid cooler:3-pin/4-pin
    • Hyperflow ARGB 240 mm:4-pin
  • Fan current
    • Liquid Freezer WS360-SP5 Processor All-in-one liquid cooler:0.33 A
    • Hyperflow ARGB 240 mm:0.19 A
  • Radiator width
    • Liquid Freezer WS360-SP5 Processor All-in-one liquid cooler:12 cm
    • Hyperflow ARGB 240 mm:27.5 cm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of WS360-SP5, Hyperflow ARGB 240 mm
65 specifications
Performance4 differ
Supported processor socketsDiffersSocket SP5Socket 755, LGA 1155 (Socket H2), LGA 1151 (Socket H4), LGA 1150 (Socket H3), LGA 1156 (Socket H), LGA 1200 (Socket H5), LGA 1366 (Socket B), LGA 1700, LGA 1851, LGA 2011 (Socket R), Socket AM4, Socket AM5
Noise level (high speed)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30.83 dB
AirflowDiffers131 m³/h95.89 m³/h
Bearing typeDiffersDual ball bearingHydraulic
Fan speed (max)Differs3000 RPM1600 RPM
Fan static pressureKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.73 mmH2O
Pump motor speedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2500 RPM
Fan's mean time to failure (MTTF)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30000 h
Maximum airflowKnown for one77 cfmUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum air pressureKnown for one6.9 mmH2OUnknown — not stated by the source
Pulse-width modulation (PWM) supportKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Pump motor speed (max)Known for one3000 RPMUnknown — not stated by the source
Pump motor speed (min)Known for one800 RPMUnknown — not stated by the source
Design3 differ
MaterialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceThermoplastic polyester (PBT), Aluminium, Synthetic rubber, EPDM, Copper, Polyphenylene sulfide (PPS)
Number of fansDiffers3 fan(s)2 fan(s)
Number of fan bladesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source9
Illumination LEDDiffersNoYes
Illumination colourKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMulti
LED connector typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3-pin
Fan connectorDiffers3-pin/4-pin4-pin
Fins materialKnown for oneCopperUnknown — not stated by the source
Display typeKnown for oneNot applicableUnknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Fan power consumptionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.28 W
Pump power consumptionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4.2 W
Fan currentDiffers0.33 A0.19 A
Thermal Design Power (TDP)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source250 W
Weight & dimensions9 differ
Radiator widthDiffers12 cm27.5 cm
Radiator depthDiffers39.8 cm2.7 cm
Radiator heightDiffers3.8 cm12 cm
Tube lengthDiffers45 cm35 cm
Pump widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source9.5 cm
Pump depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source9 cm
Pump heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5.1 cm
Fan dimensions (W x D x H)Differs120 x 120 x 25 mm120 x 25 x 120 mm
Fan thicknessKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.5 cm
Cable lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.55 m
Package widthDiffers156 mm336 mm
Package depthDiffers431 mm215 mm
Package heightDiffers154 mm143 mm
Package weightDiffers2.6 kg1.75 kg
Tube diameterKnown for one1.24 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Tube inner diameterKnown for one6 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightKnown for one2.15 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Screws includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Thermal pad includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
CPU bracket(s)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Package typeKnown for oneBoxUnknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Tube materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceEthylene-propylene diene monomer (EPDM)
Anti-vibration systemKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Logistics dataidentical
Master (outer) case widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source670 mm
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source310 mm
Master (outer) case heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source345 mm
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source11.5 kg
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source6 pc(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More computer cooling system comparisons

All computer cooling system comparisons