All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 computer cooling systems

ARCTIC Freezer 36-S vs UNYKAch AquaSphere Pro 360

Add a product
  • 20specifications compared
  • 15differ
  • 5identical
  • 35known for one product only

Key differences

The ARCTIC Freezer 36-S has 500 RPM more rotational speed (max) than the UNYKAch AquaSphere Pro 360 (3000 RPM vs 2500 RPM). The UNYKAch AquaSphere Pro 360 has 32 mm more width than the ARCTIC Freezer 36-S (120 mm vs 88 mm). The UNYKAch AquaSphere Pro 360 has 271 mm more depth than the ARCTIC Freezer 36-S (397 mm vs 126 mm). Type: Air cooler on the ARCTIC Freezer 36-S, Liquid cooling kit on the UNYKAch AquaSphere Pro 360. Bearing type: Fluid Dynamic Bearing (FDB) on the ARCTIC Freezer 36-S, Hydraulic on the UNYKAch AquaSphere Pro 360.

  • Type
    • Air cooler
    • Liquid cooling kit
  • Rotational speed (max)
    • 3000 RPM
    • 2500 RPM
  • Bearing type
    • Fluid Dynamic Bearing (FDB)
    • Hydraulic
  • Product colour
    • Black, Stainless steel
    • Black
  • Number of fans
    • 1 fan(s)
    • 3 fan(s)
  • Width
    • 88 mm
    • 120 mm
  • Depth
    • 126 mm
    • 397 mm
  • Height
    • 156 mm
    • 55 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
55 specifications
A

ARCTIC

Freezer 36-SView product
B

UNYKAch

AquaSphere Pro 360View product
Performance4 differ
TypeDiffersAir coolerLiquid cooling kit
Supported processor socketsDiffersLGA 1851, LGA 1700, Socket AM5, Socket AM4LGA 4677 (Socket E), LGA 4189, Socket SP3, Socket SP5
Compatible processor seriesKnown for oneIntel® Xeon®
Rotational speed (max)Differs3000 RPM2500 RPM
Noise level (low speed)Known for one32.6 dB
Noise level (high speed)Known for one35.6 dB
Maximum airflowKnown for one62.99 cfm
Bearing typeDiffersFluid Dynamic Bearing (FDB)Hydraulic
Pump connectorKnown for one4-pin
Pump motor speed (max)Known for one3100 RPM
Pump motor speed (min)Known for one2500 RPM
Pump's mean time to failure (MTTF)Known for one50000 h
Rotational speed (min)Known for one600 RPM
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one0 - 40 °C
Design2 differ
Product colourDiffersBlack, Stainless steelBlack
Radiator materialKnown for oneAluminum
Number of fansDiffers1 fan(s)3 fan(s)
Number of fan bladesKnown for one7
Number of finsKnown for one54
Fins materialKnown for oneAluminium
Number of heat pipesKnown for one4
Illumination LEDKnown for oneNo
Display typeKnown for oneNot applicable
Poweridentical
Thermal Design Power (TDP)Known for one450 W
Fan currentKnown for one0.33 A
Fan voltageKnown for one12 V
Weight & dimensions9 differ
WidthDiffers88 mm120 mm
DepthDiffers126 mm397 mm
HeightDiffers156 mm55 mm
Radiator widthKnown for one12 cm
Radiator depthKnown for one39.7 cm
Radiator heightKnown for one2.7 cm
Tube lengthKnown for one45 cm
WeightDiffers685 g1.8 kg
Fan dimensions (W x D x H)Differs120 x 120 x 25 mm120 x 120 x 28 mm
Package widthDiffers170 mm212 mm
Package depthDiffers195 mm465 mm
Package heightDiffers116 mm133 mm
Package volumeKnown for one13110 cm³
Package weightDiffers990 g2.12 kg
Heat pipes diameterKnown for one6 mm
Fins thicknessKnown for one0.4 mm
Cable lengthKnown for one0.2 m
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneRoHS, CE
Packaging contentidentical
Mounting kitKnown for oneYes
Logistics dataidentical
Master (outer) case widthKnown for one295 mm
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for one480 mm
Master (outer) case heightKnown for one445 mm
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for one9.39 kg
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for one4 pc(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More computer cooling system comparisons

All computer cooling system comparisons