All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 computer cases

Mars Gaming MCV5W computer case Midi Tower White vs UNYKAch HSW4208 G4

Add a product
  • 14specifications compared
  • 13differ
  • 1identical
  • 34known for one product only

Key differences

The UNYKAch HSW4208 G4 has 7 more 3.5" bays than the Mars Gaming MCV5W computer case Midi Tower White (8 vs 1). The Mars Gaming MCV5W computer case Midi Tower White has 2 more expansion slots than the UNYKAch HSW4208 G4 (9 vs 7). The Mars Gaming MCV5W computer case Midi Tower White has 9.2 cm more maximum CPU cooler height than the UNYKAch HSW4208 G4 (16.5 cm vs 7.3 cm). Form factor: Midi Tower on the Mars Gaming MCV5W computer case Midi Tower White, Rack on the UNYKAch HSW4208 G4. Material: Tempered glass on the Mars Gaming MCV5W computer case Midi Tower White, SGCC, Aluminium on the UNYKAch HSW4208 G4.

  • Form factor
    • Midi Tower
    • Rack
  • Material
    • Tempered glass
    • SGCC, Aluminium
  • Product colour
    • White
    • Black, Silver
  • Supported motherboard form factors
    • ATX, micro ATX, Mini-ITX
    • EEB, CEB, ATX, micro ATX
  • Number of 3.5" bays
    • 1
    • 8
  • Number of expansion slots
    • 9
    • 7
  • Maximum CPU cooler height
    • 16.5 cm
    • 7.3 cm
  • Maximum graphics card length
    • 41.6 cm
    • 16.9 cm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
48 specifications
A

Mars Gaming

MCV5W computer case Midi Tower White

Model MCV5W

View product
B

UNYKAch

HSW4208 G4View product
Design8 differ
Form factorDiffersMidi TowerRack
TypeKnown for oneServer
MaterialDiffersTempered glassSGCC, Aluminium
Product colourDiffersWhiteBlack, Silver
Supported motherboard form factorsDiffersATX, micro ATX, Mini-ITXEEB, CEB, ATX, micro ATX
Number of 3.5" baysDiffers18
Number of 5.25" baysKnown for one0
Number of expansion slotsDiffers97
Rack mountingKnown for oneYes
Rack capacityKnown for one2U
On/off buttonKnown for oneYes
Reset buttonKnown for oneYes
Maximum CPU cooler heightDiffers16.5 cm7.3 cm
Maximum graphics card lengthDiffers41.6 cm16.9 cm
Side windowKnown for oneYes
Tempered glass panel(s)Known for oneYes
Power supplyidentical
Power supply includedKnown for oneNo
Ports & interfaces1 differ
USB 2.0 ports quantityDiffers10
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityKnown for one2
USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-A ports quantityKnown for one0
USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C ports quantityKnown for one0
USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 Type-C ports quantityKnown for one0
Coolingidentical
Front fans installedKnown for one4x 80 mm
Fan rated voltageKnown for one12 V
Fan speedKnown for one0 - 6300 RPM
Noise level (high speed)Known for one61.4 dB
Pulse-width modulation (PWM) supportKnown for oneYes
Side fans installedKnown for one3x 120 mm
Rear fans installedKnown for one1x 120 mm
Liquid cooling capabilityKnown for oneYes
Storageidentical
Supported HDD sizesKnown for one2.5,3.5"
HDD/SSD combo cageKnown for oneYes
Hot-swapKnown for oneYes
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneRoHS, CE
Warranty periodKnown for one3 year(s)
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers286 mm447 mm
DepthDiffers430 mm660 mm
HeightDiffers402 mm87 mm
WeightDiffers5.3 kg15 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one577 mm
Package depthKnown for one826 mm
Package heightKnown for one218 mm
Package volumeKnown for one103800 cm³
Package weightKnown for one18.5 kg
Other featuresidentical
Screws includedKnown for oneYes
Fan connectorKnown for one4-pin
Logistics dataidentical
Country of originKnown for oneSpain

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More computer case comparisons

All computer case comparisons