Product comparison · 2 computer cases

Hiditec H3 PRO vs MSI MPG VIXTA 300R PZ

Add a product
  • 30specifications compared
  • 15differ
  • 15identical
  • 20known for one product only

Key differences

The Hiditec H3 PRO has 1 more 2.5" bays than the MSI MPG VIXTA 300R PZ (2 vs 1). The MSI MPG VIXTA 300R PZ has 2 cm more maximum graphics card length than the Hiditec H3 PRO (42 cm vs 40 cm). The MSI MPG VIXTA 300R PZ has 1 more USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantity than the Hiditec H3 PRO (2 vs 1). Product colour: Black, Transparent on the Hiditec H3 PRO, Black on the MSI MPG VIXTA 300R PZ. Supported motherboard form factors: ATX, micro ATX, ITX, BTF on the Hiditec H3 PRO, ATX, micro ATX, Mini-ITX on the MSI MPG VIXTA 300R PZ.

  • Product colour
    • H3 PRO:Black, Transparent
    • MPG VIXTA 300R PZ:Black
  • Supported motherboard form factors
    • H3 PRO:ATX, micro ATX, ITX, BTF
    • MPG VIXTA 300R PZ:ATX, micro ATX, Mini-ITX
  • Number of 2.5" bays
    • H3 PRO:2
    • MPG VIXTA 300R PZ:1
  • Illumination location
    • H3 PRO:Back
    • MPG VIXTA 300R PZ:Case fans
  • Maximum graphics card length
    • H3 PRO:40 cm
    • MPG VIXTA 300R PZ:42 cm
  • USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantity
    • H3 PRO:1
    • MPG VIXTA 300R PZ:2
  • Number of side fans supported (max)
    • H3 PRO:3
    • MPG VIXTA 300R PZ:2
  • Side fans diameters supported
    • H3 PRO:120 mm
    • MPG VIXTA 300R PZ:140 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of H3 PRO, MPG VIXTA 300R PZ
50 specifications
Design5 differ
MaterialKnown for oneTempered glassUnknown — not stated by the source
Product colourDiffersBlack, TransparentBlack
Supported motherboard form factorsDiffersATX, micro ATX, ITX, BTFATX, micro ATX, Mini-ITX
Number of 3.5" baysKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of 2.5" baysDiffers21
Side windowKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Illumination colourKnown for oneMultiUnknown — not stated by the source
Illumination locationDiffersBackCase fans
Tempered glass panel(s)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Anti-dust filterKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum graphics card lengthDiffers40 cm42 cm
Number of internal 3.5" baysKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Number of expansion slotsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source7
RGB control buttonKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Reset buttonKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Maximum PSU lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source19 cm
Ports & interfaces1 differ
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityDiffers12
USB Type-C ports quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 Type-C ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Cooling4 differ
Number of side fans supported (max)Differs32
Side fans diameters supportedDiffers120 mm140 mm
Number of bottom fans supported (max)Known for one3Unknown — not stated by the source
Bottom fans diameters supportedKnown for one120 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Side radiator sizes supportedDiffers360,280,240 mm120,240 mm
Top radiator sizes supportedDiffers360,280,240 mm120,240,360 mm
Side fans installedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2x 140 mm
Storage1 differ
Supported HDD sizesDiffers3.5,2.5"2.5,3.5"
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneCE, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), RoHSUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers291 mm235 mm
DepthDiffers436 mm455 mm
HeightDiffers435 mm497 mm
WeightDiffers6.9 kg8.7 kg
Other featuresidentical
Fan connectorKnown for one4-pinUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source11 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More computer case comparisons

All computer case comparisons