Product comparison · 2 computer cases

Aerocool DS 230 vs Aerocool EN20879 computer case Midi Tower Black

Add a product
  • 20specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 10identical
  • 26known for one product only

Key differences

  • Material
    • DS 230:Steel
    • EN20879 computer case Midi Tower Black:SECC
  • Supported motherboard form factors
    • DS 230:ATX, micro ATX, Mini-ITX
    • EN20879 computer case Midi Tower Black:ATX, micro ATX
  • Number of 3.5" bays
    • DS 230:2
    • EN20879 computer case Midi Tower Black:1
  • Number of 5.25" bays
    • DS 230:0
    • EN20879 computer case Midi Tower Black:4
  • USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantity
    • DS 230:2
    • EN20879 computer case Midi Tower Black:0
  • Front fans diameters supported
    • DS 230:120,140 mm
    • EN20879 computer case Midi Tower Black:140 mm
  • Supported HDD sizes
    • DS 230:2.5,3.5"
    • EN20879 computer case Midi Tower Black:3.5"
  • Width
    • DS 230:230 mm
    • EN20879 computer case Midi Tower Black:200 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of DS 230, EN20879
46 specifications
Design4 differ
Form factorMidi TowerMidi Tower
TypePCPC
MaterialDiffersSteelSECC
Product colourBlackBlack
Supported motherboard form factorsDiffersATX, micro ATX, Mini-ITXATX, micro ATX
Number of 3.5" baysDiffers21
Number of 5.25" baysDiffers04
Number of 2.5" baysKnown for one3Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of internal 3.5" baysKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of expansion slots77
Side windowNoNo
Suitable forKnown for oneGamingUnknown — not stated by the source
IlluminationKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Illumination colourKnown for oneMultiUnknown — not stated by the source
Illumination locationKnown for oneBottom, Front, SideUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum CPU cooler heightKnown for one17 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum graphics card lengthKnown for one38.8 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Power supplyidentical
Power supply includedNoNo
Power supply locationKnown for oneBottomUnknown — not stated by the source
Supported power supply form factorsKnown for oneATXUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
USB 2.0 ports quantity22
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityDiffers20
USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C ports quantity00
Audio inputYesYes
Audio outputYesYes
Cooling1 differ
Number of front fans supported (max)Known for one3Unknown — not stated by the source
Front fans diameters supportedDiffers120,140 mm140 mm
Rear fans installedKnown for one1x 120 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of rear fans supported (max)Known for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Rear fans diameters supportedKnown for one120 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of top fans supported (max)Known for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Top fans diameters supportedKnown for one120,140 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
CoolingKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Liquid cooling capabilityKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Front fans installedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1x 140 mm
Side fans installedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1x 180 mm
Side fans diameters supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source180 mm
Storage1 differ
Supported HDD sizesDiffers2.5,3.5"3.5"
Number of HDDs supportedKnown for one5Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers230 mm200 mm
DepthDiffers477.8 mm440 mm
HeightDiffers475 mm430 mm
WeightKnown for one8.2 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Material thicknessKnown for one7 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package weightKnown for one9.7 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Fan connectorKnown for one4-pinUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More computer case comparisons

All computer case comparisons