Product comparison · 2 backup storage devices

Iomega Zip® 750MB USB 2.0 Drive vs Lenovo ZIP Drive 250MB IDE int fTP Ultrabay2000

Key differences

Interface
- Zip® 750MB USB 2.0 Drive:USB 2.0
- ZIP Drive 250MB IDE int fTP Ultrabay2000:IDE (ATAPI)
Internal
- Zip® 750MB USB 2.0 Drive:No
- ZIP Drive 250MB IDE int fTP Ultrabay2000:Yes
Storage capacity
- Zip® 750MB USB 2.0 Drive:750 MB
- ZIP Drive 250MB IDE int fTP Ultrabay2000:250 MB
Width
- Zip® 750MB USB 2.0 Drive:259 mm
- ZIP Drive 250MB IDE int fTP Ultrabay2000:130 mm
Depth
- Zip® 750MB USB 2.0 Drive:245 mm
- ZIP Drive 250MB IDE int fTP Ultrabay2000:144 mm
Height
- Zip® 750MB USB 2.0 Drive:98 mm
- ZIP Drive 250MB IDE int fTP Ultrabay2000:14 mm

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Zip® 750MB USB 2.0 Drive, ZIP Drive 250MB IDE int fTP Ultrabay2000
11 specifications	A Iomega Zip® 750MB USB 2.0 Drive View product	B Lenovo ZIP Drive 250MB IDE int fTP Ultrabay2000 View product
Performance3 differ
InterfaceDiffers	USB 2.0	IDE (ATAPI)
InternalDiffers	No	Yes
Compatible operating systemsDiffers	Windows 98 (USB 1.x) Windows 98SE/Me/2000/XP(USB 1.x & USB 2.0) Mac OS 8.6 – 9.x (USB 1.x) Mac OS 10.1 (USB 1.x & USB 2.0)	Microsoft Windows 95; Microsoft Windows 98; Microsoft Windows 2000; Microsoft Windows NT 4.0
Storage1 differ
Storage capacityDiffers	750 MB	250 MB
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	259 mm	130 mm
DepthDiffers	245 mm	144 mm
HeightDiffers	98 mm	14 mm
WeightKnown for one	780 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Seek timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	29 ms

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.