Product comparison · 2 backup storage devices

Iomega Zip® 750MB USB 2.0 Drive vs Lenovo ZIP Drive 250MB IDE int fTP Ultrabay2000

Key differences

Interface
- Zip® 750MB USB 2.0 Drive:USB 2.0
- ZIP Drive 250MB IDE int fTP Ultrabay2000:IDE (ATAPI)
Internal
- Zip® 750MB USB 2.0 Drive:No
- ZIP Drive 250MB IDE int fTP Ultrabay2000:Yes
Storage capacity
- Zip® 750MB USB 2.0 Drive:750 MB
- ZIP Drive 250MB IDE int fTP Ultrabay2000:250 MB
Width
- Zip® 750MB USB 2.0 Drive:259 mm
- ZIP Drive 250MB IDE int fTP Ultrabay2000:130 mm
Depth
- Zip® 750MB USB 2.0 Drive:245 mm
- ZIP Drive 250MB IDE int fTP Ultrabay2000:144 mm
Height
- Zip® 750MB USB 2.0 Drive:98 mm
- ZIP Drive 250MB IDE int fTP Ultrabay2000:14 mm

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Zip® 750MB USB 2.0 Drive, ZIP Drive 250MB IDE int fTP Ultrabay2000
11 specifications	A Iomega Zip® 750MB USB 2.0 Drive View product	B Lenovo ZIP Drive 250MB IDE int fTP Ultrabay2000 View product
Performance3 differ
Product type	Storage drive	Storage drive
Media type	Zip disk	Zip disk
InterfaceDiffers	USB 2.0	IDE (ATAPI)
InternalDiffers	No	Yes
Compatible operating systemsDiffers	Windows 98 (USB 1.x) Windows 98SE/Me/2000/XP(USB 1.x & USB 2.0) Mac OS 8.6 – 9.x (USB 1.x) Mac OS 10.1 (USB 1.x & USB 2.0)	Microsoft Windows 95; Microsoft Windows 98; Microsoft Windows 2000; Microsoft Windows NT 4.0
Storage1 differ
Storage capacityDiffers	750 MB	250 MB
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	259 mm	130 mm
DepthDiffers	245 mm	144 mm
HeightDiffers	98 mm	14 mm
WeightKnown for one	780 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Seek timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	29 ms

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.