Product comparison · 2 backup storage devices

Freecom OEM SCSI LTO-4 FH Int. vs Fujitsu FibreCAT TX08

Add a product
  • 15specifications compared
  • 13differ
  • 2identical
  • 16known for one product only

Key differences

The Fujitsu FibreCAT TX08 has 11.2 TB more compressed capacity than the Freecom OEM SCSI LTO-4 FH Int. (12.8 TB vs 1.6 TB). The Freecom OEM SCSI LTO-4 FH Int. has 288 GB/h more backup rate compressed performance than the Fujitsu FibreCAT TX08 (864 GB/h vs 576 GB/h). The Freecom OEM SCSI LTO-4 FH Int. has 144 GB/h more backup rate native performance than the Fujitsu FibreCAT TX08 (432 GB/h vs 288 GB/h). Product type: Storage drive on the Freecom OEM SCSI LTO-4 FH Int., Storage auto loader & library on the Fujitsu FibreCAT TX08. Logical recording format: LTO Ultrium 4 on the Freecom OEM SCSI LTO-4 FH Int., Multiple Track linear on the Fujitsu FibreCAT TX08.

  • Logical recording format
    • OEM SCSI LTO-4 FH Int.:LTO Ultrium 4
    • FibreCAT TX08:Multiple Track linear
  • Native capacity
    • OEM SCSI LTO-4 FH Int.:800 GB
    • FibreCAT TX08:6.4 TB
  • Compressed capacity
    • OEM SCSI LTO-4 FH Int.:1.6 TB
    • FibreCAT TX08:12.8 TB
  • Backup rate compressed performance
    • OEM SCSI LTO-4 FH Int.:864 GB/h
    • FibreCAT TX08:576 GB/h
  • Backup rate native performance
    • OEM SCSI LTO-4 FH Int.:432 GB/h
    • FibreCAT TX08:288 GB/h
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • OEM SCSI LTO-4 FH Int.:35 W
    • FibreCAT TX08:80 W
  • Weight
    • OEM SCSI LTO-4 FH Int.:2.24 kg
    • FibreCAT TX08:14 kg
  • Operating temperature (T-T)
    • OEM SCSI LTO-4 FH Int.:10 - 40 °C
    • FibreCAT TX08:10 - 35 °C

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of OEM SCSI LTO-4 FH Int., FibreCAT TX08
31 specifications
Performance2 differ
Product typeDiffersStorage driveStorage auto loader & library
InterfaceKnown for one4 GB Fibre, 3 GB Serial Attach SCSI (SAS), U320 SCSIUnknown — not stated by the source
InternalKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Data storage typeKnown for oneLTOUnknown — not stated by the source
Compression ratioKnown for one2:1Unknown — not stated by the source
Logical recording formatDiffersLTO Ultrium 4Multiple Track linear
Product colourKnown for oneBlackUnknown — not stated by the source
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for one25000 hUnknown — not stated by the source
Read/write head lifeKnown for one60000 hUnknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for oneUL, CSA, TUV, CE, NOM, FCC, VCCI, C-tick, RRL, BCIQ, BSMI, GOSHUnknown — not stated by the source
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one-Windows 2000, 2003, XP -LinuxUnknown — not stated by the source
Storage2 differ
Native capacityDiffers800 GB6.4 TB
Compressed capacityDiffers1.6 TB12.8 TB
Data transmission2 differ
Backup rate compressed performanceDiffers864 GB/h576 GB/h
Backup rate native performanceDiffers432 GB/h288 GB/h
Sustained data transfer rate (native)Known for one120 MB/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Supported data transfer ratesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4 Gbit/s, 3 Gbit/s
Power2 differ
Power requirementsDiffers5V DC, 3.6A; 12V DC, 1.6AAC 100 - 240 (± 10%) V, 50 - 60 Hz
Power consumption (standby)Known for one12 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (typical)Differs35 W80 W
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Size (imperial)Known for one13.3 cm (5.25")Unknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers2.24 kg14 kg
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs10 - 40 °C10 - 35 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-40 - 66 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs20 - 85%20 - 80%
Other features2 differ
Data compressionDiffersLTO-DC2
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs146 x 203 x 82.5 mm447.5 x 805 x 43.75 mm
Recommended mediaKnown for oneLTO Ultrium 4, 800 GB RW & WORMUnknown — not stated by the source
Cartridge holderKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More backup storage device comparisons

All backup storage device comparisons