Product comparison · 2 backup storage devices

Acer Altos LTO-3 HH Tape Autoloader vs Freecom OEM SCSI LTO-4 FH Int.

Add a product
  • 5specifications compared
  • 4differ
  • 1identical
  • 26known for one product only

Key differences

The Acer Altos LTO-3 HH Tape Autoloader has 4.8 TB more compressed capacity than the Freecom OEM SCSI LTO-4 FH Int. (6.4 TB vs 1.6 TB). Product type: Storage auto loader & library on the Acer Altos LTO-3 HH Tape Autoloader, Storage drive on the Freecom OEM SCSI LTO-4 FH Int.. Native capacity: 3.2 TB on the Acer Altos LTO-3 HH Tape Autoloader, 800 GB on the Freecom OEM SCSI LTO-4 FH Int.. Recommended media: LTO-3 on the Acer Altos LTO-3 HH Tape Autoloader, LTO Ultrium 4, 800 GB RW & WORM on the Freecom OEM SCSI LTO-4 FH Int..

  • Native capacity
    • Altos LTO-3 HH Tape Autoloader:3.2 TB
    • OEM SCSI LTO-4 FH Int.:800 GB
  • Compressed capacity
    • Altos LTO-3 HH Tape Autoloader:6.4 TB
    • OEM SCSI LTO-4 FH Int.:1.6 TB

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of Altos LTO-3 HH Tape Autoloader, OEM SCSI LTO-4 FH Int.
31 specifications
Performance1 differ
Product typeDiffersStorage auto loader & libraryStorage drive
Media typeTape CartridgeTape Cartridge
InterfaceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4 GB Fibre, 3 GB Serial Attach SCSI (SAS), U320 SCSI
InternalKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Data storage typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLTO
Compression ratioKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2:1
Logical recording formatKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLTO Ultrium 4
Product colourKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBlack
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source25000 h
Read/write head lifeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source60000 h
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceUL, CSA, TUV, CE, NOM, FCC, VCCI, C-tick, RRL, BCIQ, BSMI, GOSH
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-Windows 2000, 2003, XP -Linux
Standard interfacesKnown for oneSCSIUnknown — not stated by the source
Storage2 differ
Native capacityDiffers3.2 TB800 GB
Compressed capacityDiffers6.4 TB1.6 TB
Drive device, buffer sizeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source128 MB
Data transmissionidentical
Backup rate compressed performanceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source864 GB/h
Backup rate native performanceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source432 GB/h
Sustained data transfer rate (native)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source120 MB/s
Poweridentical
Power requirementsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5V DC, 3.6A; 12V DC, 1.6A
Power consumption (standby)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source12 W
Power consumption (typical)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source35 W
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Size (imperial)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source13.3 cm (5.25")
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.24 kg
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-40 - 66 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 - 85%
Other features1 differ
Data compressionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLTO-DC
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source146 x 203 x 82.5 mm
Recommended mediaDiffersLTO-3LTO Ultrium 4, 800 GB RW & WORM
MountingKnown for one2UUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More backup storage device comparisons

All backup storage device comparisons