Product comparison · 2 women's shavers

Philips SatinShave Advanced BRL140/50 women's shaver 1 head(s) Trimmer Pink, White vs Philips HP6409 1 head(s) White, Yellow

11specifications compared
3differ
8identical
28known for one product only

Key differences

Only the Philips SatinShave Advanced BRL140/50 women's shaver 1 head(s) Trimmer Pink, White has trimmer. Only the Philips SatinShave Advanced BRL140/50 women's shaver 1 head(s) Trimmer Pink, White has rechargeable. Product colour: Pink, White on the Philips SatinShave Advanced BRL140/50 women's shaver 1 head(s) Trimmer Pink, White, White, Yellow on the Philips HP6409 1 head(s) White, Yellow.

Trimmer
- SatinShave Advanced BRL140/50 women's shaver 1 head(s) Trimmer Pink, White:Yes
- HP6409 1 head(s) White, Yellow:No
Product colour
- SatinShave Advanced BRL140/50 women's shaver 1 head(s) Trimmer Pink, White:Pink, White
- HP6409 1 head(s) White, Yellow:White, Yellow
Rechargeable
- SatinShave Advanced BRL140/50 women's shaver 1 head(s) Trimmer Pink, White:Yes
- HP6409 1 head(s) White, Yellow:No

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of BRL140/50, HP6409
39 specifications	A Philips SatinShave Advanced BRL140/50 women's shaver 1 head(s) Trimmer Pink, White Model BRL140/50 View product	B Philips HP6409 1 head(s) White, Yellow Model HP6409 View product
Features2 differ
TrimmerDiffers	Yes	No
Number of shaver bladesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0
PeelingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Pivoting headKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Product colourDiffers	Pink, White	White, Yellow
Wet & DryKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
CordlessKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Handle(s) featuresKnown for one	Ergonomic	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
RechargeableDiffers	Yes	No
Power sourceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	AC
Power requirementsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100-127V / 220-240V (50-60Hz)
Motor voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	14 V
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3 W
Battery typeKnown for one	Built-in battery	Unknown — not stated by the source
Battery recharge timeKnown for one	8 h	Unknown — not stated by the source
Battery capacity indicatorKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Charging timeKnown for one	8 h	Unknown — not stated by the source
Input voltageKnown for one	8 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating timeKnown for one	60 min	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
A-box dimensions (LxWxH)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	400 x 200 x 247 mm
A-box number of piecesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 pc(s)
A-box weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3.63 kg
F-box dimensionsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	232 x 175 x 75 mm
F-box weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	679.8 g
Packaging contentidentical
Accessories includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Sensitive area cap: For delicate body areas, Detachable shaving head: For a smooth shave, Exfoliation body puff: Fewer ingrown hairs, Cleaning brush: For easy cleaning, Luxury storage pouch: For storage and protection
Other featuresidentical
TypeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Epilator
Logistics dataidentical
Products per pallet (UK)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	75 pc(s)
Products per palletKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	60 pc(s)
Pallet size (EU)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1133 x 1200 x 800 mm
Pallet size (GB)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1133 x 1200 x 1000 mm
Batteryidentical
Battery technologyKnown for one	Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion)	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More women's shaver comparisons

All women's shaver comparisons