Product comparison · 2 wireless routers

Zyxel NBG420N Wireless N Router + NWD210N Wireless N USB Adapter vs Zyxel P-660HW-T3 v2

12specifications compared
9differ
3identical
20known for one product only

Key differences

Supports ISDN connection
- NBG420N Wireless N Router + NWD210N Wireless N USB Adapter:No
- P-660HW-T3 v2:Yes
Supported network protocols
- NBG420N Wireless N Router + NWD210N Wireless N USB Adapter:PPPoE, PPTP, DHCP, Static IP
- P-660HW-T3 v2:IPSec, PPTP, NAT, SUA
Antenna gain level (max)
- NBG420N Wireless N Router + NWD210N Wireless N USB Adapter:1.8 dBi
- P-660HW-T3 v2:2 dBi
Operating relative humidity (H-H)
- NBG420N Wireless N Router + NWD210N Wireless N USB Adapter:20 - 85%
- P-660HW-T3 v2:20 - 95%
Operating temperature (T-T)
- NBG420N Wireless N Router + NWD210N Wireless N USB Adapter:0 - 40 °C
- P-660HW-T3 v2:0 - 50 °C
Weight
- NBG420N Wireless N Router + NWD210N Wireless N USB Adapter:230 g
- P-660HW-T3 v2:325 g
Dimensions (WxDxH)
- NBG420N Wireless N Router + NWD210N Wireless N USB Adapter:162 x 115 x 33 mm
- P-660HW-T3 v2:180 x 128 x 36 mm
Maximum data transfer rate
- NBG420N Wireless N Router + NWD210N Wireless N USB Adapter:0.3 Gbit/s
- P-660HW-T3 v2:0.1 Gbit/s

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of NBG420N Wireless N Router + NWD210N Wireless N USB Adapter, P-660HW-T3 v2
32 specifications	A Zyxel NBG420N Wireless N Router + NWD210N Wireless N USB Adapter View product	B Zyxel P-660HW-T3 v2 View product
Network1 differ
Networking standardsKnown for one	IEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11n	Unknown — not stated by the source
Full duplexKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Supports ISDN connectionDiffers	No	Yes
Ports & interfacesidentical
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one	4	Unknown — not stated by the source
DC-in jackKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Management featuresidentical
Quality of Service (QoS) supportKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Web-based managementKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Reset buttonKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Securityidentical
Stateful Packet Inspection (SPI)Known for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
FilteringKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
MAC address filteringKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Protocols1 differ
DHCP client	Yes	Yes
DHCP server	Yes	Yes
Universal Plug and Play (UPnP)	Yes	Yes
Supported network protocolsDiffers	PPPoE, PPTP, DHCP, Static IP	IPSec, PPTP, NAT, SUA
Management protocolsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	FTP/TFTP, SNMP, Telnet
Certificatesidentical
CertificationKnown for one	CSA international EMI: CE, FCC part 15B	Unknown — not stated by the source
Antenna1 differ
Antenna gain level (max)Differs	1.8 dBi	2 dBi
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs	20 - 85%	20 - 95%
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs	0 - 40 °C	0 - 50 °C
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	20 - 90%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	-20 - 60 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	230 g	325 g
Other features3 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	162 x 115 x 33 mm	180 x 128 x 36 mm
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers	0.3 Gbit/s	0.1 Gbit/s
Power requirementsKnown for one	12 VDC 1.0 A	Unknown — not stated by the source
xDSL connectionDiffers	No	Yes
Networking featuresKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Ethernet LAN, ADSL
Power supply typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	12V AC
WLAN data transfer rates supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	54 Mbit/s
I/O portsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4x 10/100 Ethernet (RJ-45) 1x ADSL (RJ-45)
DSL featuresidentical
ADSLKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More wireless router comparisons

All wireless router comparisons