All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 wireless routers

Lenovo 4XH0H34187 wireless router Dual-band (2.4 GHz vs TP-Link Archer C5400

Add a product
  • 21specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 11identical
  • 43known for one product only

Key differences

  • 3G/4G USB modem compatibility
    • Yes
    • No
  • 3G
    • Yes
    • No
  • 4G
    • Yes
    • No
  • Antenna design
    • Internal
    • Internal & external
  • Operating relative humidity (H-H)
    • 5 - 95%
    • 10 - 90%
  • Operating temperature (T-T)
    • -5 - 40 °C
    • 0 - 40 °C
  • Depth
    • 76.8 mm
    • 230 mm
  • Height
    • 30 mm
    • 43 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
64 specifications
A

Lenovo

4XH0H34187 wireless router Dual-band (2.4 GHz

Model 4XH0H34187

View product
B

TP-Link

Archer C5400View product
WAN connection1 differ
Ethernet WANKnown for oneYes
3G/4G USB modem compatibilityDiffersYesNo
Wireless LAN features1 differ
Wi-Fi bandDiffersDual-band (2.4 GHz / 5 GHz)Tri-band (2.4 GHz / 5 GHz / 5 GHz)
WLAN data transfer rate (max)Known for one2167 Mbit/s
WLAN data transfer rate (first band)Known for one2167 Mbit/s
WLAN data transfer rate (second band)Known for one2167 Mbit/s
WLAN data transfer rate (third band)Known for one1000 Mbit/s
Number of WLAN connections (max)Known for one5
Networkidentical
Ethernet LANKnown for oneYes
Ethernet LAN interface typeKnown for oneGigabit Ethernet
Ethernet LAN data ratesKnown for one10,100,1000 Mbit/s
Cabling technologyKnown for one10/100/1000Base-T(X)
Networking standardsKnown for oneIEEE 802.11a, IEEE 802.11ac, IEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11n
Port forwardingKnown for oneYes
VPN supportKnown for onePPTP, L2TP, IPSec
Mobile network2 differ
3GDiffersYesNo
4GDiffersYesNo
Ports & interfacesidentical
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one5
USB portKnown for oneYes
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityKnown for one1
Management featuresidentical
Reset buttonKnown for oneYes
WPS push buttonKnown for oneYes
Securityidentical
Security algorithmsKnown for one64-bit WEP, 128-bit WEP, WPA, WPA-PSK, WPA2, WPA2-PSK
Guest accessKnown for oneYes
DMZ supportKnown for oneYes
Protocolsidentical
DHCP clientKnown for oneYes
DHCP serverKnown for oneYes
Universal Plug and Play (UPnP)Known for oneYes
VoIP protocolsKnown for oneIPv4, IPv6
Designidentical
LED indicatorsKnown for onePower
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneLAN (RJ-45)
AC adapter includedKnown for oneYes
ManualKnown for oneYes
Quick start guideKnown for oneYes
Antenna1 differ
Antenna designDiffersInternalInternal & external
Antennas quantityKnown for one8
Featuresidentical
Built-in processorKnown for oneYes
Processor frequencyKnown for one1.4 MHz
Processor coresKnown for one2
Poweridentical
Output voltageKnown for one12 V
Output currentKnown for one5 A
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs5 - 95%10 - 90%
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs-5 - 40 °C0 - 40 °C
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one5 - 90%
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-40 - 70 °C
System requirementsidentical
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for oneYes
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneYes
Weight & dimensions3 differ
DepthDiffers76.8 mm230 mm
HeightDiffers30 mm43 mm
WidthDiffers136 mm230 mm
WeightKnown for one140 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package typeKnown for oneBox
Certificatesidentical
CertificationKnown for oneTUV Mark, FCC,CCC (China), SRRC(China), ICES, CE (Europe), C-TICK (Australia/New Zealand), VCCI(Japan), CB

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More wireless router comparisons

All wireless router comparisons