Product comparison · 2 wireless presenters

Canon X Mark I Presenter vs Philips SNP3000 Presenter

7specifications compared
6differ
1identical
31known for one product only

Key differences

The Canon X Mark I Presenter has 24 more buttons quantity than the Philips SNP3000 Presenter (27 vs 3). The Canon X Mark I Presenter has 39.87 mm more width than the Philips SNP3000 Presenter (43.5 mm vs 3.63 mm). The Canon X Mark I Presenter has 141.3 mm more depth than the Philips SNP3000 Presenter (143 mm vs 1.7 mm). Product colour: Black on the Canon X Mark I Presenter, White on the Philips SNP3000 Presenter.

Product colour
- X Mark I Presenter:Black
- SNP3000 Presenter:White
Buttons quantity
- X Mark I Presenter:27
- SNP3000 Presenter:3
Width
- X Mark I Presenter:43.5 mm
- SNP3000 Presenter:3.63 mm
Depth
- X Mark I Presenter:143 mm
- SNP3000 Presenter:1.7 mm
Height
- X Mark I Presenter:19.5 mm
- SNP3000 Presenter:12.3 mm
Weight
- X Mark I Presenter:77 g
- SNP3000 Presenter:0.0334 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of X Mark I Presenter, SNP3000/10
38 specifications	A Canon X Mark I Presenter View product	B Philips SNP3000 Presenter Model SNP3000/10 View product
Performanceidentical
Wireless receiver interfaceKnown for one	USB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Wireless technologyKnown for one	RF	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB portKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Features2 differ
Product colourDiffers	Black	White
Buttons quantityDiffers	27	3
Laser pointer colourKnown for one	Red	Unknown — not stated by the source
Battery level indicatorKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
MaterialKnown for one	Aluminium, Plastic	Unknown — not stated by the source
On/off switchKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
TimerKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Number of batteries supportedKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Battery typeKnown for one	AAA	Unknown — not stated by the source
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Mac compatibilityKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	43.5 mm	3.63 mm
DepthDiffers	143 mm	1.7 mm
HeightDiffers	19.5 mm	12.3 mm
WeightDiffers	77 g	0.0334 g
Packaging contentidentical
Batteries includedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Carrying caseKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
DisplayKnown for one	LCD	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display digitsKnown for one	8 digits	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 pc(s)
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	33.4 g
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	130 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	36 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	238 mm
Technical detailsidentical
Gross weight of outer cartonKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3.58 kg
Height (cm) outer cartonKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	14.3 cm
Length (cm) outer cartonKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	49.2 cm
Net weight of outer cartonKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.668 kg
Packaging net weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.0334 kg
Packaging tare weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.0673 kg
Quantity outer cartonKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20 pc(s)
Tare weight outer cartonKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2.912 kg
Width (cm) outer cartonKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	22.8 cm

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More wireless presenter comparisons

All wireless presenter comparisons