Product comparison · 2 wireless presentation systems

NEC DS1-MP10RX1 wireless presentation system HDMI Dongle vs ScreenBeam Flex wireless presentation system HDMI + USB Type-A Desktop

Add a product
  • 15specifications compared
  • 13differ
  • 2identical
  • 32known for one product only

Key differences

The ScreenBeam Flex wireless presentation system HDMI + USB Type-A Desktop has 1 more USB 2.0 ports quantity than the NEC DS1-MP10RX1 wireless presentation system HDMI Dongle (2 vs 1). The NEC DS1-MP10RX1 wireless presentation system HDMI Dongle has 1.6 W more power consumption (typical) than the ScreenBeam Flex wireless presentation system HDMI + USB Type-A Desktop (10 W vs 8.4 W). The ScreenBeam Flex wireless presentation system HDMI + USB Type-A Desktop has 103 mm more width than the NEC DS1-MP10RX1 wireless presentation system HDMI Dongle (220 mm vs 117 mm). Form factor: Dongle on the NEC DS1-MP10RX1 wireless presentation system HDMI Dongle, Desktop on the ScreenBeam Flex wireless presentation system HDMI + USB Type-A Desktop. Product colour: Black on the NEC DS1-MP10RX1 wireless presentation system HDMI Dongle, White on the ScreenBeam Flex wireless presentation system HDMI + USB Type-A Desktop.

  • Form factor
    • DS1-MP10RX1 wireless presentation system HDMI Dongle:Dongle
    • Flex wireless presentation system HDMI + USB Type-A Desktop:Desktop
  • Product colour
    • DS1-MP10RX1 wireless presentation system HDMI Dongle:Black
    • Flex wireless presentation system HDMI + USB Type-A Desktop:White
  • Interface
    • DS1-MP10RX1 wireless presentation system HDMI Dongle:HDMI
    • Flex wireless presentation system HDMI + USB Type-A Desktop:HDMI + USB Type-A
  • USB 2.0 ports quantity
    • DS1-MP10RX1 wireless presentation system HDMI Dongle:1
    • Flex wireless presentation system HDMI + USB Type-A Desktop:2
  • Power source type
    • DS1-MP10RX1 wireless presentation system HDMI Dongle:AC
    • Flex wireless presentation system HDMI + USB Type-A Desktop:DC
  • Input voltage
    • DS1-MP10RX1 wireless presentation system HDMI Dongle:5 V
    • Flex wireless presentation system HDMI + USB Type-A Desktop:12 DC
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • DS1-MP10RX1 wireless presentation system HDMI Dongle:10 W
    • Flex wireless presentation system HDMI + USB Type-A Desktop:8.4 W
  • Storage temperature (T-T)
    • DS1-MP10RX1 wireless presentation system HDMI Dongle:10 - 60 °C
    • Flex wireless presentation system HDMI + USB Type-A Desktop:20 - 85 °C

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of DS1-MP10RX1, Flex
47 specifications
Design2 differ
Form factorDiffersDongleDesktop
Product colourDiffersBlackWhite
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceFCC, RED, RoHS, UL
Featuresidentical
AirPlay mirroringKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Google CastKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
MiracastKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Maximum resolution (HDMI)Known for one1920 x 1080 pixelsUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum frame rateKnown for one60 fpsUnknown — not stated by the source
Network1 differ
Wi-Fi standardsDiffers802.11b, 802.11g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
Top Wi-Fi standardKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
Dual-bandKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
BluetoothKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Ethernet LANKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Ethernet LAN data ratesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10,100,1000 Mbit/s
Cabling technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10/100/1000Base-T(X)
Networking standardsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIEEE 802.1x
Supported network protocolsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIEEE 802.1x, WPA-PSK (TKIP), WPA2-PSK (AES), PEAP-MSCHAPv2, EAP-TLS
Frequency bandKnown for one2.4 GHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces2 differ
InterfaceDiffersHDMIHDMI + USB Type-A
Number of HDMI outputsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
USB 2.0 ports quantityDiffers12
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
3.5 mm (1/8-inch) outKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
DC-in jackKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power3 differ
Power source typeDiffersACDC
Input voltageDiffers5 V12 DC
Input currentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3 A
Power consumption (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source24.8 W
Power consumption (typical)Differs10 W8.4 W
Output currentKnown for one2 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (standby)Known for one0.1 WUnknown — not stated by the source
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWindows 10, Windows 11
Mac compatibilityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMac OS X 11.0 Big Sur, Mac OS X 12.0 Monterey, Mac OS X 13.0 Ventura
Other operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceChromeOS
Mobile operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAndroid 8.0, Android 8.1, Android 9.0, iOS 13, iOS 13.4, iOS 14, iOS 14.5, iOS 15, iOS 16
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 - 80%
Storage temperature (T-T)Differs10 - 60 °C20 - 85 °C
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 - 90%
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers117 mm220 mm
DepthDiffers47 mm144 mm
HeightDiffers14 mm37.5 mm
WeightDiffers49 g453.5 g
Packaging contentidentical
AC adapter includedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More wireless presentation system comparisons

All wireless presentation system comparisons