Barco CX-50 GEN2 vs ScreenBeam 1100 Plus SBWD1100P

Key differences

The Barco CX-50 GEN2 has 1 more USB 2.0 ports quantity than the ScreenBeam 1100 Plus SBWD1100P (3 vs 2). The Barco CX-50 GEN2 has 14 W more power consumption (max) than the ScreenBeam 1100 Plus SBWD1100P (50 W vs 36 W). The ScreenBeam 1100 Plus SBWD1100P has 10 - 90% more storage relative humidity (H-H) than the Barco CX-50 GEN2 (10 - 90% vs 0 - 90%). Security algorithms: WPA2-PSK on the Barco CX-50 GEN2, EAP-TLS, PEAP, WPA-PSK, WPA2-PSK on the ScreenBeam 1100 Plus SBWD1100P. Interface: HDMI on the Barco CX-50 GEN2, HDMI + USB Type-A on the ScreenBeam 1100 Plus SBWD1100P.

• Interface
  • CX-50 GEN2:HDMI
  • 1100 Plus SBWD1100P:HDMI + USB Type-A
• USB 2.0 ports quantity
  • CX-50 GEN2:3
  • 1100 Plus SBWD1100P:2
• Power source type
  • CX-50 GEN2:AC
  • 1100 Plus SBWD1100P:DC
• Input voltage
  • CX-50 GEN2:110 - 220 V
  • 1100 Plus SBWD1100P:12 DC
• Power consumption (max)
  • CX-50 GEN2:50 W
  • 1100 Plus SBWD1100P:36 W
• Operating relative humidity (H-H)
  • CX-50 GEN2:0 - 85%
  • 1100 Plus SBWD1100P:-20 - 85%
• Storage temperature (T-T)
  • CX-50 GEN2:-20 - 60 °C
  • 1100 Plus SBWD1100P:20 - 80 °C
• Storage relative humidity (H-H)
  • CX-50 GEN2:0 - 90%
  • 1100 Plus SBWD1100P:10 - 90%