All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 wireless presentation systems

Barco ClickShare Button vs Barco wePresent WiPG-1600W

Add a product
  • 15specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 5identical
  • 29known for one product only

Key differences

The Barco wePresent WiPG-1600W has 96 mm more width than the Barco ClickShare Button (159 mm vs 63 mm). The Barco ClickShare Button has 70.3 mm more depth than the Barco wePresent WiPG-1600W (161.3 mm vs 91 mm). The Barco wePresent WiPG-1600W has 13.9 mm more height than the Barco ClickShare Button (29.9 mm vs 16 mm). Product colour: Black on the Barco ClickShare Button, Black, White on the Barco wePresent WiPG-1600W. Frequency band: 2.4, 5, 6 GHz on the Barco ClickShare Button, 2.4 & 5 on the Barco wePresent WiPG-1600W.

  • Product colour
    • Black
    • Black, White
  • Frequency band
    • 2.4, 5, 6 GHz
    • 2.4 & 5
  • Interface
    • USB Type-C
    • HDMI + VGA (D-Sub)
  • Power source type
    • USB
    • DC, PoE
  • Width
    • 63 mm
    • 159 mm
  • Depth
    • 161.3 mm
    • 91 mm
  • Height
    • 16 mm
    • 29.9 mm
  • Weight
    • 88 g
    • 293 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
44 specifications
A

Barco

ClickShare ButtonView product
B

Barco

wePresent WiPG-1600WView product
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffersBlackBlack, White
Featuresidentical
Supported video modesKnown for one1080p
Number of usersKnown for one64 user(s)
Supported graphics resolutionsKnown for one3840 x 2160
Management featuresidentical
Reset buttonKnown for oneYes
Antennaidentical
Antennas quantityKnown for one2
Network3 differ
Wi-Fi standardsDiffersWi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), 802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)802.11a, Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), 802.11b, 802.11g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
Frequency bandDiffers2.4, 5, 6 GHz2.4 & 5
Ethernet LANKnown for oneYes
Security algorithmsDiffersWPA3-SAEWPA, WPA-Enterprise, WPA2-PSK
Top Wi-Fi standardKnown for oneWi-Fi 6E (802.11ax)
Ports & interfaces1 differ
InterfaceDiffersUSB Type-CHDMI + VGA (D-Sub)
Number of HDMI outputsKnown for one1
VGA (D-Sub) output portsKnown for one1
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one1
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one3
3.5 mm (1/8-inch) outKnown for oneYes
Power1 differ
Power source typeDiffersUSBDC, PoE
Power consumption (typical)Known for one15.3 W
Power over Ethernet (PoE)Known for oneYes
Input currentKnown for one0.6 A
Suitable for use in country/locationKnown for oneUnited States
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneWindows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8
Mac compatibilityKnown for oneYes
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneMac OS X 10.10 Yosemite, Mac OS X 10.11 El Capitan, Mac OS X 10.12 Sierra, Mac OS X 10.9 Mavericks
Mobile operating systems supportedKnown for oneAndroid 4.0, Android 4.1, Android 4.2, Android 4.2.1, Android 4.3, Android 4.4, Android 5.0, Android 5.1, Android 6.0, Android 7.1, iOS 9.0, iOS 9.1, iOS 9.2, iOS 9.3
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one0 - 85%
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-20 - 60 °C
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one0 - 85%
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers63 mm159 mm
DepthDiffers161.3 mm91 mm
HeightDiffers16 mm29.9 mm
WeightDiffers88 g293 g
Package widthKnown for one216 mm
Package depthKnown for one220 mm
Package heightKnown for one66 mm
Package weightKnown for one801 g
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one85176990
Country of originKnown for oneChina

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More wireless presentation system comparisons

All wireless presentation system comparisons