Product comparison · 2 wireless access points

Zebra AP 7502E vs Zebra Motorola AP-7522 1000 Mbit/s

Add a product
  • 15specifications compared
  • 9differ
  • 6identical
  • 24known for one product only

Key differences

  • Maximum data transfer rate
    • AP 7502E:300 Mbit/s
    • Motorola AP-7522 1000 Mbit/s:1000 Mbit/s
  • Frequency band
    • AP 7502E:2.4 - 5.85 GHz
    • Motorola AP-7522 1000 Mbit/s:5.8 GHz
  • Security algorithms
    • AP 7502E:802.1x RADIUS, WPA2
    • Motorola AP-7522 1000 Mbit/s:WPA, WPA2
  • Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
    • AP 7502E:4
    • Motorola AP-7522 1000 Mbit/s:1
  • LED indicators
    • AP 7502E:Activity
    • Motorola AP-7522 1000 Mbit/s:Yes
  • Width
    • AP 7502E:95 mm
    • Motorola AP-7522 1000 Mbit/s:180 mm
  • Depth
    • AP 7502E:90 mm
    • Motorola AP-7522 1000 Mbit/s:165 mm
  • Height
    • AP 7502E:35 mm
    • Motorola AP-7522 1000 Mbit/s:41 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of AP 7502E, AP-7522
39 specifications
Features3 differ
2.4 GHzKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
5 GHzKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers300 Mbit/s1000 Mbit/s
Maximum data transfer rate (5 GHz)867 Mbit/s867 Mbit/s
Ethernet LAN data ratesKnown for one10,100,1000 Mbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Frequency bandDiffers2.4 - 5.85 GHz5.8 GHz
Networking standardsDiffersIEEE 802.11a, IEEE 802.11ac, IEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11i, IEEE 802.11nIEEE 802.11a, IEEE 802.11ac, IEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11h, IEEE 802.11i, IEEE 802.3
Quality of Service (QoS) supportKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Transmitting powerKnown for one15 dBmWUnknown — not stated by the source
Channel bandwidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source80 MHz
ModulationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source256-QAM
Security1 differ
Security algorithmsDiffers802.1x RADIUS, WPA2WPA, WPA2
Security featuresKnown for oneStateful packet inspection (SPI), Network address translation (NAT), WIPSUnknown — not stated by the source
IP address filteringYesYes
Protocolsidentical
DHCP serverYesYes
DHCP clientYesYes
Supported protocolsKnown for one- EN 55022, FCC Part 15, ICES 003, EU RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU, EN 55024: 2003, EN 55024: 2010 + A2, EN 55024: 2010 + A1 - UL EU EN 60950-1 2nd Ed., ANZ RCM - FCC 15.247, 15.407Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers41
DC-in jackKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power over Ethernet (PoE)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (typical)Known for one7 WUnknown — not stated by the source
AC input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source48 V
Input currentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.28 A
Design1 differ
Product colourKnown for oneWhiteUnknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsDiffersActivityYes
InternalNoNo
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers95 mm180 mm
DepthDiffers90 mm165 mm
HeightDiffers35 mm41 mm
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source820 g
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one5 - 90%Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating temperature (T-T)0 - 40 °C0 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-40 - 70 °C
Antennaidentical
Antennas quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
Antenna gain level (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source6 dBi
Antenna connector typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceRP-SMA
Number of connectorsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
Certificatesidentical
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceRoHS
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source85176990

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More wireless access point comparisons

All wireless access point comparisons